This is quite a nice write up by a colleague of mine:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/build-your-own-anycast-network-9-steps-samir-jafferali
Hey!
New message, please read <http://adelante.com/thinking.php?w>
Franck Martin
Hey!
New message, please read <http://igoasia.org/dare.php?a>
Franck Martin
Hey!
New message, please read <http://ciberpresario.com/lose.php?5n>
Franck Martin
Hey!
New message, please read <http://www.autler-kfz.at/secret.php?7>
Franck Martin
I think the next requirement for iOS apps: "We ran your app on an IPv6 only
network and it did not work. Your submission to the Apple store is
therefore denied."
Done.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Irwin, Kevin
wrote:
> Hello, if there is anyone from LinkedIn on the board, can you please
> contact me offline?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin Irwin
> Network Engineer – Core Network Engineering
> Cincinnati Bell Telephone
>
> "It has been my observation that most
You have dmarcian, returnpath and agari to process reports.
https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/
Will give you an idea who send aggregate reports. To state the obvious,
they will send you a report only if you send them email.
Allow 24 to 48 hours to get your first reports, if you don't get any, ch
On Jan 7, 2015, at 10:38 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
> Is there a list of NIC (and other popular whois server) features (what
> can be searched on) and what data they provide (and what title they
> give it)?
>
Your best bet today is http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpwhois/
and from http://phpwhoi
On Nov 25, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote:
> Hail NANOG!
>
> I am looking for IPv6 security resources to add to:
> http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ipv6/security/
>
> These could be best current practice documents, case-studies,
> lessons-learned/issues-found, research/evalua
On Nov 19, 2014, at 9:14 AM, John Kristoff wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:58:24 -0800
> Mike wrote:
>
>
>> I am wondering if anyone has a pointer or reference to any tools
>> which might help facillitate this?
>
> I can point you to some tools and references I'm aware of, but I can't
> talk
On Oct 19, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
>
>> But to make a long story short, and my memory's perhaps a bit rusty
>> now, but my recollection is that shorter URL's looked nicer and there
>> was significant money to be had running the re
On Aug 18, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
>> And this is why we're going to have the
>> "always remember to lock your screen
>> before stepping way from your computer"
>> tutorial at the next member's breakfast...
>
> a - the forge was n
On Aug 10, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Gabriel Marais wrote:
> Hi Nanog
>
> I'm curious.
>
> I have been receiving some major ssh brute-force attacks coming from random
> hosts in the 116.8.0.0 - 116.11.255.255 network. I have sent a complaint to
> the e-mail addresses obtained from a whois query on one
On Apr 20, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> why does this list break DKIM when forwarding?
>
> From the Gmail headers your email :
>
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
>spf=neutral (google.com
, at 16:07, "Scott Howard"
mailto:sc...@doc.net.au>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Franck Martin
mailto:fmar...@linkedin.com>> wrote:
why does this list break DKIM when forwarding?
>From the Gmail headers your email :
Authentication-Results: mx.google
On Apr 20, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Barney Wolff wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:01:38PM +0000, Franck Martin wrote:
>> So I believe, if this list was not stripping the HTML part of the emails, as
>> it does not add a subject tag nor a footer, then DKIM would survive the list
>
So I believe, if this list was not stripping the HTML part of the emails, as it
does not add a subject tag nor a footer, then DKIM would survive the list and
all would be fine…
why does this list break DKIM when forwarding?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On Mar 26, 2014, at 11:26 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 8:12 PM, Robert Drake wrote:
>
>>
>> On 3/26/2014 10:16 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>>
>>> and user@2001:db8::1.25 with user@192.0.2.1:25. Who had the good idea to
>>
On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Cutler James R
> wrote:
>
>> 3. Arguing about IPv6 in the context of requirements upon SMTP connections
>> is playing that uncomfortable game with one’s own combat boots. And not
>> particularly produc
On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Octavio Alfageme wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I work for a small service provider starting to offer MPLS services between
> Europe and several african countries. At present time we own a small Cisco
> network, but we are starting to need a better inventory of servic
On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Robert Webb wrote:
> A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server. It is
> now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email.
>
> Using their tools they did not report my IP as having a bad reputation. I
> applied for white listing
On Jan 14, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> Just saw this in a message tonight. No idea if this is a transient error or
> not.
>
> ---
> host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
> [gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com][2607:f8b0:4002:c01::1a]
>said: 550-5.7.1 [2607:ff70:11::11] Our system has d
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 1/15/2014 10:14 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Darren Pilgrim > <mailto:na...@bitfreak.org>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/14/2014 4:06 PM, Brandon Applegate wro
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Darren Pilgrim
wrote:
> On 1/14/2014 4:06 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>> Just saw this in a message tonight. No idea if this is a transient error
>> or not.
>>
>> ---
>> host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
>> [gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com][2607:f8b0:4002:c01::1a]
>>
www.maawg.org has published a sender BCP, please read it
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
If you want to block spam on IPv6, then you can start by rejecting connections
to SMTP from any IPv6 that do not have a PTR. No need to analyze the format of
the PTR.
It is in several recommendations that a sending email IP must have a PTR.
That ISPs will not do a PTR on all IPv6 but only on st
On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:49 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:45:44 +0200, Andre Tomt said:
>> Seems the entire .biz tld is failing DNSSEC validation now.
>> All of my DNSSEC validating resolvers are tossing all domains in .biz.
>> The non-signed domains too of course becau
Another Internet reboot?
Can we find something better?
On Jun 22, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Andre Tomt wrote:
> On 22. juni 2013 20:45, Andre Tomt wrote:
>> Seems the entire .biz tld is failing DNSSEC validation now.
>> All of my DNSSEC validating resolvers are tossing all domains in .biz.
>> The non-s
When staying at Homestead a few years back, they would close my Internet
connection, because I was downloading movies via peer to peer. It took me
a while and escalating to a relatively competent network engineer to
figure it out: "Mate, I don't have any p2p software installed, may be my
computer i
t;
>>>> Zaid
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Mike Hale wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It looks like Fintel and TFL are both providers for Southern Cross
>>>>> cable. That would be your best bet if they can get lines out to y
like Fintel and TFL are both providers for Southern Cross
>>> cable. That would be your best bet if they can get lines out to you.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, there's always VSAT, but that brings a set of other issues
>>>with it.
>>>
>>> Ping m
In no particular order
Connect.com.fj aka tfl.com.fj
Fintel.com.fj
Vodafone.com.fj (via a 3G stick)
Digicel.com.fj (via a 2G stick, but also via a wireless backbone network)
If you want to do BGP or IPv6, good luck!
Is that for Fiji Water? ;)
These people have very good operational Internet exp
Universal Access vs Universal Service
It is important to understand the difference.
I have argued that Developing countries should only provide Universal
Access as the weight of providing Universal Service is way too expensive
and would tax too much the business community which is developing the
On 1/5/12 8:07 , "Jay Ashworth" wrote:
>- Original Message -
>> From: "Zaid Ali"
>
>> On 1/5/12 7:22 AM, "Jay Ashworth" wrote:
>>
>> >Vint Cerf says no: http://j.mp/wwL9Ip
>> >
>
>The question here is "is *access to* the Internet a human right,
>something
>which the government ought t
Option 2) and think country wide ISP growing very fast.
On 12/9/11 10:39 , "Patrick W. Gilmore" wrote:
>On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>area desperately looking for enough
I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific area
desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their business the way
they would like…
This is just a data point.
Report the problem on Twitter or Facebook.
It is a common issue that support staff go via a scripted process.
You can play, I'm the IT manager of a fortune 500 company, to see if they
still consider you as a luddite, but really your only option is to either
try to escalate the call (talk to super
I'm using a GRE IPv4 tunnel between a cisco and linux machines
I did some packet capture, and saw that my MTU was 1418, but the cisco was
sending TCP packet with a MSS of 1380. This created a bunch of issues. When I
told the cisco box to use a MSS of 1378 everything starting to work fine.
So wh
Once upon a time, there was only the IETF, then NOGs came and standards
became sloppy
http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics/
Something is happening...
On 6/2/11 21:34 , "Hank Nussbacher" wrote:
>On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>
>In that case can anyone explain why the number of IPv4 *only* systems is
>increasing rather than decreasing:
>http://server8.test-ipv6
I think the yahoo test should just differentiate between no IPv6 and IPv6
is slow (test between 3s and 10s). Like:
We have detected that you have IPv6 and will be able to access our site on
IPv6 day, but your user experience may not be as good as with IPv4, you
may consider disabling IPv6.
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/ipv6/general/ipv6-05.html
"Will IPv6 become a permanent change on June 8, 2011?
No. World IPv6 day is a 24-hour trial period in which we will publish our
content on both the IPv4 and IPv6 servers. Yahoo! is participating in order to
help prepare our services (as w
Zabbix allows to acknowledge events with a comment.
On 4/25/11 22:47 , "Payam Poursaied" wrote:
>Hi all
>May I have your recommendation regarding any outage management software
>and NOC log book(preferably open source) .
>I want to get fresh ideas about available software in this area.
>
>The b
On 4/23/11 11:24 , "Lynda" wrote:
>On 4/22/2011 4:01 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>
>> On 4/23/11 10:41 , "Alex Brooks" wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Franck Martin
>>> wrote:
>>>> What is the DKIM check r
On 4/23/11 10:41 , "Alex Brooks" wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Franck Martin
>wrote:
>> What is the DKIM check result for those messages?
>
>Non existent, it's SPF only.
My point.
>
>This is what GMail sees:
>
>Received: fr
What is the DKIM check result for those messages?
May be time to get nanog mailing list DKIM aware?
On 4/22/11 13:24 , "Bill Blackford" wrote:
>I've recently observed gmail dropping messages or not forwarding all
>messages/posts from the nanog list. This is rather annoying.
>
>Has anyone else
Recently, Microsoft Australia has been refused a temp allocation (like
they had every year) for one of their conferences.
On 4/15/11 9:01 , "Iljitsch van Beijnum" wrote:
>On 14 apr 2011, at 13:02, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
>> Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M
Don't forget the use for 911 type services.
On 4/12/11 8:10 , "Jeroen van Aart" wrote:
>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20336-internet-probe-can-track-you-d
>own-to-within-690-metres.html
>"The new method zooms in through three stages to locate a target
>computer. The first stage measures
Also remember, you would be serving Australia only from Australia. if I'm
not mistaken, the Australia backbone is more or less volume based
cahrged...
http://www.aarnet.edu.au/services/aarnet-charging.aspx
"AARNet3 charges are different for Shareholders (Members) and for Non
Shareholders (Associat
On 3/31/11 11:55 , "Wil Schultz" wrote:
>
>
>On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Alexander Harrowell
>wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
>>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> A
Or http://www.budget.co.ck/ ..
On 3/30/11 3:25 , "Tony Finch" wrote:
>George Bonser wrote:
>>
>> What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
>> purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
>> sullying the company's image.
>
>Who is forcing them?
Well, you don't need to wait for .xxx you have things like
http://www.radio.co.ck/
On 3/30/11 3:25 , "Tony Finch" wrote:
>George Bonser wrote:
>>
>> What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
>> purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
>> su
On 3/29/11 10:18 , "Wil Schultz" wrote:
>I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing
>ipv6 out.
>
>
>3) ??? Any others that I haven't thought of ???
>
>So basically I'd love to set up some sites for ipv6.domain.com via 6to4
>as a phase one, and at some point in the
And then you can have lens effects, where the waves reflections on the
coast, focus unto a point on the coastline.
On 3/28/11 14:34 , "Scott Howard" wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:28 PM, andrew.wallace <
>andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:59 AM, wrote:
>>
On 3/26/11 15:36 , "Joe Sniderman" wrote:
>On 03/25/2011 11:12 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 25, 2011, at 12:19 52PM, Akyol, Bora A wrote:
>>
>>> One could argue that you could try something like the facebook
>>> model (or facebook itself). I can see it coming. Facebook web of
>>> t
- Original Message -
> From: "Roland Dobbins"
> To: "nanog group"
> Sent: Friday, 25 March, 2011 9:33:27 AM
> Subject: Re: The state-level attack on the SSL CA security model
> On Mar 24, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > Disclosure devalues information.
>
>
> I think th
+1
They know the challenges, aware of the issues and I have seen some progress.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Atkins"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March, 2011 9:56:20 AM
Subject: Re: SORBS contact?
On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Mike wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 12:14 PM, Paul
But do they route?
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush"
To: "NANOG Operators' Group"
Sent: Tuesday, 8 March, 2011 2:24:15 AM
Subject: the largest deployment of v6 in japan
http://avexnet.or.jp/v6/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V6_%28band%29
- Original Message -
> From: "Jeroen Massar"
> To: "Franck Martin"
> Cc: "George Bonser" , "NANOG list"
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 March, 2011 1:41:45 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6? Why, you are the first one to ask for it!
> On 2011-03-0
Don't forget there is no commission for the salesperson to enable IPv6 for you,
so definitively they are not interested and you asking them to deal with the
issue, will just lower their pay at the end of the month because they could not
use this valuable time to find customers with commissions..
don't care between RD and DHCPv6, what I care, is that they should
be able to do their job correctly on their own.
- Original Message -
From: "Owen DeLong"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc: "Matthew Palmer" , nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 27 February, 2011 6:
Yes I don't understand why we need DHCPv6, true RD did not have DNS information
to pass, but that is fixed, no?
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Palmer"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 27 February, 2011 4:06:29 PM
Subject: Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at
You have products like a cell on wheels. A container containing a phone switch
and a mobile cell, easily installable. You place it at the center of the
disaster zone and all mobile phones start to work...
if you are worried about congestion, then only the "right" sims are
registered/enabled.
-
- Original Message -
> From: "Scott Helms"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Saturday, 19 February, 2011 8:07:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an
> IPv6naysayer...)
> On 2/18/2011 1:53 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> &g
http://www.jetcafe.org/~npc/isp/large.html
If you take the 5 top US ISPs and get them to do dual stack IPv6, that's 50
million subscribers in the US only.
I think google and others will notice some serious traffic happening.
It took a market share of 10 to 20% of Mozilla for web developers to g
- Original Message -
> From: "Randy Bush"
> To: "Fred Baker"
> Cc: "Franck Martin" , "North American Network Operators
> Group"
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 2:37:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Local root zone (Was NYTimes: Egy
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Abley"
> To: "Doug Barton"
> Cc: "John Curran" , "NANOG"
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 12:05:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete
> On 2011-02-16, at 17:33, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > 2. Is there any objection t
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Millnert"
> To: "Marshall Eubanks"
> Cc: "North American Network Operators Group"
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 8:28:22 AM
> Subject: Re: NYTimes: Egypt Leaders Found ‘Off’ Switch for Internet
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Marshall Eubank
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Dillon"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Monday, 14 February, 2011 10:37:51 AM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
> > It's bad that home gateways need replacing
>
> It's not neccessarily bad. There are a lot of older devices out there
> and
- Original Message -
> From: "George Bonser"
> To: "Franck Martin" , "Fred Baker"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 10:31:42 AM
> Subject: RE: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
> > > They missed an importa
- Original Message -
> From: "Fred Baker"
> To: "Franck Martin"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 9:43:56 AM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
> On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
I can hear people, say oh no
Interesting to see that marketers do not like CGNAT.
- Original Message -
> From: "Charles N Wyble"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:57:23 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 status
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/09/2011 06:35 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> &g
I like that tool: http://bgp.he.net/AS55327
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Bates"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:41:41 PM
Subject: Re: Is your ASN advertising v6 prefixes?
On 2/9/2011 8:21 PM, Fred Richards wrote:
> Mine is.
> Well?
>
http://www.cidr-report.org
Looking at the recent exchange on the list re IPv6, it seems we are in the
"whose fault is it?"
• Denial (this isn't happening to me!)
• Anger (why is this happening to me ?)
• Bargaining (I promise I'll be a better person if ...)
• Depression (I don't care anymore)
• Acc
- Original Message -
> From: "Jason Bertoch"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 9:09:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
> On 2011/02/09 2:44 PM, Jens Link wrote:
> No, IPv6 rollout is going to be extremely expensive and will likely
> put
> a numb
eople that develop your applications and configure the servers,
get them to be familiar with it, give them a sandbox, and then when everyone
stop to run like headless chicken, plan your transition.
- Original Message -
From: "William Herrin"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc:
You missed the IPv6 hour at Nanog42:
http://www.civil-tongue.net/grandx/wiki/nanog42
https://wiki.tools.isoc.org/IETF71_IPv4_Outage
May be another one is needed?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Lyon"
To: "Jack Bates"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 7:30:55 AM
Sub
This is dual stack, my recommendation is disable IPv6 on your servers (so your
clients will still talk to them on IPv4 only), and let your client goes IPv6
first. Once you understand what is happening, get on IPv6 on your servers.
Alternatively, use someone else network to understand IPv6. Atten
Any relation?
http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/11/02/04/0043234/Verizon-To-Throttle-High-Bandwidth-Users
- Original Message -
From: "Joly MacFie"
To: "North American Network Operators Group"
Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 4:30:27 PM
Subject: Fwd: You Tube Problems
This was recently pos
The biggest complaint that I hear from ISPs, is that their upstream ISP does
not support IPv6 or will not provide them with a native IPv6 circuit.
Is that bull?
I thought the whole backbone is IPv6 now, and it is only the residential ISPs
that are still figuring it out because CPE are still n
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Graydon"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 8:39:09 AM
> Subject: Re: External sanity checks
> On 02/03/2011 08:04 AM, Philip Lavine wrote:
> > To all,
> >
> > Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checks
> > aga
and who is the upstream ISP that allows the AS to propagate?
http://bgp.he.net/AS36938#_graph4
aut-num:AS37004
as-name:SUBURBAN-AS
descr: Sub-Urban Telecom
organisation: ORG-ST1-AFRINIC
org-name: Suburban Telecom
org-type: LIR
descr: LIR Xtra Small
- Original Message -
> From: "Benson Schliesser"
> To: "andrew.wallace"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Saturday, 29 January, 2011 2:47:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 1:44 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
>
> > We should be asking the Egyptians to stagg
You should do a rap song...
IPv6, IPv4, it is all my fault!
Internet was just an experiment
- Original Message -
From: "Joly MacFie"
To: "Ben McGinnes"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 30 January, 2011 6:36:21 AM
Subject: Re: Found: Who is responsible for no more IP addresses
Thanks f
Just make sure you don't shoot yourself in the foot by telling the best route
to the end of the tunnel is via the tunnel itself...
I use it too: http://www.avonsys.com/blogpost367 but because I have no other
choice.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Johnson"
To: "C. Jon Larsen" , nano
If I'm correct, in 2000 in Fiji, the main fiber optic cable from the national
provider to the international provider was sabotaged, cutting all
communications. Fortunately an Alcatel team was on the island (SCC
commissioning) with the right tools and could splice it back in a few hours,
otherwi
PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 filtering
On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> Ok filtering ipv6 and ipv6-icmp is understood, it is like ipv4.
Be advised, ICMPv6 is *not* like ICMP in IPv4, and knowing what can be
filtered, what to filter, and where to filter it is considerably more comple
What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6
firewall.
- Original Message -
From: "Mirjam Kuehne"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
Subject: Future of the I
• ipv6 41 IPv6 # IPv6
• ipv6-route 43 IPv6-Route # Routing Header for IPv6
• ipv6-frag 44 IPv6-Frag # Fragment Header for IPv6
• ipv6-crypt 50 IPv6-Crypt # Encryption Header for IPv6
• ipv6-auth 51 IPv6-Auth # Authentication Header for IPv6
• ipv6-icmp 58 IPv6-ICMP icm
In the early 90's a friend of mine got a box of 10 HP cards with all the same
MAC address.
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Wooden"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 2 January, 2011 4:33:46 PM
Subject: The tale of a single MAC
Hi there,
I encountered an interesting issue today and I
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen DeLong"
> To: "John Levine"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Sunday, 5 December, 2010 2:54:43 PM
> Subject: Re: How do you do rDNS for IPv6 ?
> On Dec 5, 2010, at 2:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> > When hosts self-configure their low 64 bits, do you inst
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Oberman"
> To: "Franck Martin"
> Cc: "Jeroen van Aart" , "NANOG list"
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 November, 2010 12:31:47 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns
> > Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:36:28 +1
My understanding was that there was a partial power outage that lasted only a
few minutes for some systems (not the entire facility). Generators kicked in
but a few UPS did not do their job correctly.
- Original Message -
From: "Ravi Pina"
To: "Ulf Zimmermann"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent:
I use HE.NET in a few installations (with BGP) and they have good support
(which is quite awesome for a free service).
As people pointed out avoid 6to4, Apple just rendered it nearly useless in its
latest OS-X.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeroen van Aart"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Saturd
Yes, you need to be able to spell Hex backward ;)
- Original Message -
From: "Jeroen van Aart"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Saturday, 30 October, 2010 2:06:32 PM
Subject: IPv6 rDNS
I battled for a few hours getting IPv6 rDNS to work. The following tool
proved to be quite helpful:
http://www.
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen DeLong"
> To: "Franck Martin"
> Cc: "Randy Carpenter" , nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 11:48:58 AM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
> It's very interesting
(log2(Addresses in /56)-22)
http://www.apnic.net/services/apply-for-resources/check-your-eligibility/check-ipv6
http://www.apnic.net/services/become-a-member/how-much-does-it-cost
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Carpenter"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, "N
I think APNIC has a policy that defines the minimum IPv6 allocation based on
your current IPv4 allocation/usage. This would fix the problem?
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Carpenter"
To: "Nick Hilliard"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 6:31:18 AM
Subject: Re: IPv
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
