Nothing is stopping the perpetrator of a BGP hijack as a result of a forged
or otherwise illegitimate LOA from facing civil litigation as a result of
revenue loss or other harm done.
This thread and others like it highlight that there is absolutely some
negligence here and could very well find its
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Peter Beckman wrote:
And while it would be nice if everyone "independently verified every LOA"
the cost of doing so in the far-too-many edge cases is business-endingly
high.
If carriers faced legal liability, with appropriate incentatives, I'd bet
they would solve the ve
US/Canada (ideally all of NANPA) Carriers need to standardize the porting
process.
Right now, I have an anecdotal database for each carrier which requires a
slightly different process. For Verizon Wireless, you have to generate a
Port Out PIN for each number, which expire after 7 days. Excellent!
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:20:22PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> >Anecdotal: With the prior consent of the DID holders, I have successfully
> >ported peoples' numbers using nothing more than a JPG scan of a signature
> >that looks like an illegible 150 dpi b
4 matches
Mail list logo