In message <5414.1257270...@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu w
rites:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:11:15 PST, Mike said:
> >
> > Small-site multi-homing is one of the great inequities of the
> > Internet and one that can, and should, be solved. I envision an Internet
> > of the
Clue Store wrote:
> I think you're missing my point and did not read my post completely.
>
> First off, BGP was never mentioned in my post.
Oops, you are correct. Somebody else said "BGP." You spoke of the
existing table, and so I had BGP in my mind, and I muddled the two
together. Mea culp
I think you're missing my point and did not read my post completely.
First off, BGP was never mentioned in my post.
By the time these 'dreamers' want to announce a /29 to multiple providers
and have everyone accept them with this new light weight protocol you speak
about, there will hopefully be
Clue Store wrote:
> Well you and the rest of these so called "dreamers" can help with the
> purchase of my new routers that don't exist yet to support you wanting to
> multi-home a /29 and have the rest of the Internet world hold all of these
> said /29's in their tables. Most folks who get a /29'
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:11:15 PST, Mike said:
>> Small-site multi-homing is one of the great inequities of the
>> Internet and one that can, and should, be solved. I envision an Internet
>> of the future where anyone with any mixture of any type of network
>
While the idea of seamless routing sounds great, so does world peace... I
don't think I will see either in my lifetime. There are some technical
hurdles you will have to solve first.
1st how do I solve security (preventing spoofing and other evil deeds done by
rouge networks).
2nd how can my s
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:11:15 PST, Mike said:
>
> Small-site multi-homing is one of the great inequities of the
> Internet and one that can, and should, be solved. I envision an Internet
> of the future where anyone with any mixture of any type of network
> connections can achieve, automatic
> If 500 companies are currently
> announcing /24s to be heard, but could be moved to /29s, then you still
> have 500 route announcements. You just have a lot less waste.
That's my situation here. I've got a /24 with fewer than 10 public IPs
active, because I need those 10 hosts to be reachable e
Well you and the rest of these so called "dreamers" can help with the
purchase of my new routers that don't exist yet to support you wanting to
multi-home a /29 and have the rest of the Internet world hold all of these
said /29's in their tables. Most folks who get a /29's don't care how they
get t
Small-site multi-homing is one of the great inequities of the
Internet and one that can, and should, be solved. I envision an Internet
of the future where anyone with any mixture of any type of network
connections can achieve, automatically, provider independence and
inbound/outbound load
10 matches
Mail list logo