Kirill Elagin writes:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
>
>> I use that as much as possible.
>> There's really no need for a lot of packages to be in systemPackages or
>> in some user profile if they only provide a service and don't have lots
>> of often-used CLI tools. Same
Kirill Elagin writes:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
>
>> Kirill Elagin writes:
>>
>> > Yes, we can nub them (to be precise, it makes sense to subtract
>> > `systemPackages` from `dbus.packages`), those lists contain
>> > package names, not derivations.
>>
>> Why should s
I had the same problem, while I have been using SLiM.
I am currently using KDM, and it works OK.
You might have some other process that is not working properly with systemd.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Display_manager#Incompatibility_with_systemd
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Roelof
Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 02:29 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>> but when I do nix-build -A cinnamon-settings-daeemon in the directory
>> which contains the nix file I get a message that default.nix cannot be
>> found.
>
> Normally, you should call "nix-build" in the root of the nixpkgs tr
Peter Simons wrote:
> > When I want to reboot my box I enter 'reboot' in the prompt. And most
> > of the time I see unmounting /nix/store and nothings happens after
> > that.
>
> I've run into this issue, too, but only sporadically. I have no idea
> what might be the cause of this phenomenon. I
Eelco Dolstra wrote:
> On 08/04/14 09:54, Marc Weber wrote:
>> Also "waste of space/bandwidth" always happens because:
>>
>> - nixos always ships with header files for all libraries
>> (this could be fixed because nix supports multiple outputs)
>
> Yeah, multiple outputs will fix this event
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
> I use that as much as possible.
> There's really no need for a lot of packages to be in systemPackages or
> in some user profile if they only provide a service and don't have lots
> of often-used CLI tools. Same goes for udevPackages.
>
How e
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
> Kirill Elagin writes:
>
> > Yes, we can nub them (to be precise, it makes sense to subtract
> > `systemPackages` from `dbus.packages`), those lists contain
> > package names, not derivations.
>
> Why should systemPackages be subtracted?
> The
Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> On 04/06/2014 06:24 PM, Ben Franksen wrote:
>>How do I customize what gets put in my profile and environment?
>
> Currently there are no options. All paths are linked into user
> profiles/environments (but for a few hard-coded exceptions).
Ok, thanks.
> I plan some wo
Kirill Elagin writes:
> Yes, we can nub them (to be precise, it makes sense to subtract
> `systemPackages` from `dbus.packages`), those lists contain
> package names, not derivations.
Why should systemPackages be subtracted?
There are packages that I want in my path _and_ as a dbus service.
>
>
Yes, we can nub them (to be precise, it makes sense to subtract
`systemPackages` from `dbus.packages`), those lists contain
package names, not derivations.
But, why not simply require all the packages that provide DBus services to
be added to `dbus.packages`? That way we avoid duplication and have
On 04/08/2014 09:29 PM, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
However, wouldn't it be possible to uniq/nub these lists on evaluation?
It's perfectly functional/declarative, but I don't know if derivations
are comparable (for equality).
They are comparable, as what you get in hand is practically the output
path,
Vladimír Čunát writes:
> On 04/07/2014 11:36 AM, Kirill Elagin wrote:
>> So, the question is: what is the purpose of having
>> services.dbus.packages if those configs are considered anyway due to
>> packages being in systemPackages?
>
> AFAIK there are cases where packages are not put into system
On 04/08/2014 02:29 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
but when I do nix-build -A cinnamon-settings-daeemon in the directory
which contains the nix file I get a message that default.nix cannot be
found.
Normally, you should call "nix-build" in the root of the nixpkgs tree,
or supply the root by -f param
On 04/07/2014 11:36 AM, Kirill Elagin wrote:
So, the question is: what is the purpose of having
services.dbus.packages if those configs are considered anyway due to
packages being in systemPackages?
AFAIK there are cases where packages are not put into systemPackages,
only to services.dbus.pac
On 04/06/2014 06:24 PM, Ben Franksen wrote:
How do I customize what gets put in my profile and environment?
Currently there are no options. All paths are linked into user
profiles/environments (but for a few hard-coded exceptions).
I plan some work on allowing to exclude some files from l
Hi everyone,
skedge.me, is looking for a full-time devops engineer to build a system for
automating infrastructure tasks with Haskell, NixOS, and Amazon Web
Services. We're a small, rapidly-growing startup, and infrastructure
automation is a critical to our continued growth. Our clients include
Helllo,
I have this nix build script :
{ stdenv, fetchurl, pkgconfig, autoreconfHook, glib, gettext, gnome_common,
cinnamon-desktop}:
let
version = "2.0.8";
in
stdenv.mkDerivation {
name = "cinnamon-settings-daemon-${version}";
src = fetchurl {
url =
"http://github.com/linuxmint
Vladimír Čunát schreef op 8-4-2014
10:19:
On
04/08/2014 10:00 AM, Marc Weber wrote:
I'm unsure about whether gnome desktop is
supported now. I think its
still not (please correct me if I'm wrong). Thus try to clarify
whet
solutions:
1) push to another repository which allows seting up hooks, then sync to
github/nixos
2) don't preven this when pushing, prevent when pulling by:
git merge --ff-only or .git/config:
merge.ff
[..]
When set to only, only such fast-forward merges are allowed (equival
Thanks!
Eelco Dolstra writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/04/14 10:08, Malcolm Matalka wrote:
>
>> Is there documentation for what the default firewall configuration is?
>
> Yeah, see the "Firewall" section in the manual:
> http://nixos.org/nixos/manual/#idm140194845698704
__
On 04/08/2014 10:00 AM, Marc Weber wrote:
I'm unsure about whether gnome desktop is supported now. I think its
still not (please correct me if I'm wrong). Thus try to clarify whether
you're talking about gnome libraries or the gnome desktop.
I'm quite certain gnome (=gnome2) doesn't work for ye
Excerpts from Domen Kožar's message of Mon Apr 07 17:31:58 + 2014:
> As soon as we allow more than one design pattern for sharing code between
> packages,
package in my use cases means "having same name and having most build
instructions be the same".
We do already have "sharing" for different
Hi,
On 08/04/14 10:08, Malcolm Matalka wrote:
> Is there documentation for what the default firewall configuration is?
Yeah, see the "Firewall" section in the manual:
http://nixos.org/nixos/manual/#idm140194845698704
--
Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/
___
Hi,
On 08/04/14 09:54, Marc Weber wrote:
> I'll give you another useful tip: If you want to "save bandwidth" then
> switch to binary distro. While nixos has had the ability to create
> "binary differences" I'm unsure wether its activated/available at the
> moment. It was disabled in the past. May
Is there documentation for what the default firewall configuration is?
Eelco Dolstra writes:
> Hi,
>
> Just a heads-up that starting with revision 694cc61, NixOS enables its
> firewall
> by default. If you don't want this, you should explicitly set
>
> networking.firewall.enable = false;
>
>
Hi Roelof, I have a "deja vue",
Is it true that you asked this in 2011?
We have "gnome" expressions in nixpkgs, because gnome libraries are used
by some applications which compile and work (eg network manager or
such).
I'm unsure about whether gnome desktop is supported now. I think its
still no
Hi,
Just a heads-up that starting with revision 694cc61, NixOS enables its firewall
by default. If you don't want this, you should explicitly set
networking.firewall.enable = false;
in your configuration.nix.
--
Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/
_
Excerpts from Raahul Kumar's message of Tue Apr 08 03:11:03 + 2014:
> Thanks Marc, Kiril. Is there a way to create packages such that they don't
> provide redundant files? It's a waste of bandwidth to download a file,
> then be unable to use it because there is already a copy there. I guess
> d
On 04/08/2014 09:01 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Is there a manual how to do this ?
http://nixos.org/nixos/manual/#sec-upgrading
Vlada
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://l
Kirill Elagin schreef op 8-4-2014 8:55:
> If we are still talking about 13.10, then Gnome3 was not actually
> supported in NixOS,
> but there was an expression for it called gnome3.
> In NixOS 13.10 Gnome2 is used.
>
oke,
Then I think I have to switch to current.
Is there a manual how to do this
31 matches
Mail list logo