Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Dan Harkless" writes:
> >I'm not sure I like the new "DATE" file handling. First off, I wouldn't
> >have called it "DATE", as usually all-caps files are meant to be user
> >docum
"Dan Harkless" writes:
>
>I'm not sure I like the new "DATE" file handling. First off, I wouldn't
>have called it "DATE", as usually all-caps files are meant to be user
>documentation, and a file called "DATE" with a bare date in it i
I'm not sure I like the new "DATE" file handling. First off, I wouldn't
have called it "DATE", as usually all-caps files are meant to be user
documentation, and a file called "DATE" with a bare date in it isn't too
illuminating. True, "VERSI
