Ralph wrote:
> Agreed, but the inconsistency smells? Anyone have a reason why
> show's behaviour can't be the desired target long-term?
I just committed a simple fix to mhshow. It now updates
the context before diving into the messages, like show.
David
___
Hi David,
> show(1) doesn't quite do the right thing either. Quitting before the
> last message of many has a different but equally disturbing effect:
> the current message is set to the last selected message, even though
> it was never shown.
I'd forgotten that, but have been bitten.
> Does an
Ralph wrote:
> On an old nmh, so apologies if it's already fixed, doing `mhshow 42'
> where 42 isn't the current message and then getting bored with the
> needless emailed images and entering `q' at the `press to show
> content' prompt seems to fail to make 42 the current message, as
> show(1) wou
Hi,
On an old nmh, so apologies if it's already fixed, doing `mhshow 42'
where 42 isn't the current message and then getting bored with the
needless emailed images and entering `q' at the `press to show content'
prompt seems to fail to make 42 the current message, as show(1) would,
even though $?
