On Lu, 13 iul 15, 21:17:59, Yeison Quintero wrote:
> Good evening David.
>
> Please send to me the steps to install and configure notmuch-mutt. I
> already have mutt instaled in my OS.
Dear Yeison,
Mutt and notmuch are independent programs. notmuch-mutt is just the
"glue" to connect them. Befor
On Lu, 13 iul 15, 21:17:59, Yeison Quintero wrote:
> Good evening David.
>
> Please send to me the steps to install and configure notmuch-mutt. I
> already have mutt instaled in my OS.
Dear Yeison,
Mutt and notmuch are independent programs. notmuch-mutt is just the
"glue" to connect them. Befor
On Sb, 22 nov 14, 10:44:45, David Bremner wrote:
> Edward Betts writes:
>
>
> > I wonder if 'notmuch insert' could be modified to detect and drop the From_
> > line before writing the message to disk and index it. It could do that
> > silently or with a warning.
>
> I don't know about the large
On Sb, 22 nov 14, 10:44:45, David Bremner wrote:
> Edward Betts writes:
>
>
> > I wonder if 'notmuch insert' could be modified to detect and drop the From_
> > line before writing the message to disk and index it. It could do that
> > silently or with a warning.
>
> I don't know about the large
On Mi, 27 aug 14, 07:29:38, Perttu Luukko wrote:
>
> Well this is embarrassing, but this was indeed the case. I had cleaned
> the Maildir from what I thought were leftover symlinks from some time
> long ago. Actually, I had a script that creates, with symlinks, a copy
> of my mailbox without the d
On Mi, 27 aug 14, 07:29:38, Perttu Luukko wrote:
>
> Well this is embarrassing, but this was indeed the case. I had cleaned
> the Maildir from what I thought were leftover symlinks from some time
> long ago. Actually, I had a script that creates, with symlinks, a copy
> of my mailbox without the d
On Sb, 19 apr 14, 18:52:02, Eric wrote:
>
> This may not actually be any help, but both hypermail and mhonarc agree
> that two messages form a separate thread from the rest. I believe that
> the latter, at least, is the JWZ algorithm.
mutt concurs.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain i
On Sb, 19 apr 14, 18:52:02, Eric wrote:
>
> This may not actually be any help, but both hypermail and mhonarc agree
> that two messages form a separate thread from the rest. I believe that
> the latter, at least, is the JWZ algorithm.
mutt concurs.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain i
On Jo, 14 feb 13, 00:36:58, Profpatsch wrote:
>
> So much for copying a basic rc from someone else.
There's no problem with that, as long as you take the time to read and
understand what each option does.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enou
On Jo, 14 feb 13, 00:36:58, Profpatsch wrote:
>
> So much for copying a basic rc from someone else.
There's no problem with that, as long as you take the time to read and
understand what each option does.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enou
On Mi, 30 ian 13, 22:39:40, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> That said, I think this feature is indeed useful at times but it should
> be implemented in the UI on user command or as a configurable (e.g. mutt
> provides the command), not a default underlying behaviour
> of the backend. If this is pursued, i
On Mi, 30 ian 13, 22:39:40, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> That said, I think this feature is indeed useful at times but it should
> be implemented in the UI on user command or as a configurable (e.g. mutt
> provides the command), not a default underlying behaviour
> of the backend. If this is pursued, i
On Ma, 29 ian 13, 14:14:38, Carl Worth wrote:
> I'm
> excited to start looking close at the new features that I've not played
> with (nmbug, date parsing, etc.), and maybe start implementing some of
> those ancient features that I never got around to implementing in the
> first place, (indexing of
On Ma, 29 ian 13, 14:14:38, Carl Worth wrote:
> I'm
> excited to start looking close at the new features that I've not played
> with (nmbug, date parsing, etc.), and maybe start implementing some of
> those ancient features that I never got around to implementing in the
> first place, (indexing of
On Lu, 10 dec 12, 12:57:57, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> On 10/12/12 12:39, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 10 dec 12, 12:30:32, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> This is slightly offtopic, but I would like to move all emails in a
> >> Maildir fo
On Lu, 10 dec 12, 12:30:32, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is slightly offtopic, but I would like to move all emails in a Maildir
> folder into an Archive
> folder. What is the easiest way of doing this? I assume I ave to do this
> outside notmuch, but is
> there an easy way? I have 250 000
On Lu, 10 dec 12, 12:57:57, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> On 10/12/12 12:39, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 10 dec 12, 12:30:32, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> This is slightly offtopic, but I would like to move all emails in a
> >> Maildir fo
On Lu, 10 dec 12, 12:30:32, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is slightly offtopic, but I would like to move all emails in a Maildir
> folder into an Archive
> folder. What is the easiest way of doing this? I assume I ave to do this
> outside notmuch, but is
> there an easy way? I have 250 000
[Remembered to Reply-All, my fingers are trained to Reply-List only ;) ]
On Du, 28 oct 12, 18:12:40, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> Ah. And I assume you want to see those in your inbox even if they're
> not a reply to some other message in your inbox? I do recall Gmail
> suppressing list reflection
On Du, 28 oct 12, 11:31:38, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> Why does that cause you to not receive mailing lists? (Or did I
> misinterpret your statement?)
Yes. The main deterrent in Gmail silently dropping my own postings
returning via the list, because it considers it identical to the sent
messag
[Remembered to Reply-All, my fingers are trained to Reply-List only ;) ]
On Du, 28 oct 12, 18:12:40, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> Ah. And I assume you want to see those in your inbox even if they're
> not a reply to some other message in your inbox? I do recall Gmail
> suppressing list reflection
On Du, 28 oct 12, 11:31:38, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> Why does that cause you to not receive mailing lists? (Or did I
> misinterpret your statement?)
Yes. The main deterrent in Gmail silently dropping my own postings
returning via the list, because it considers it identical to the sent
messag
On Sb, 27 oct 12, 10:00:46, David Bremner wrote:
>
> As I said (or tried to say), in my opinion, duplication with an external
> package is not the main issue; I think moving features into the core
> when appropriate is a normal development process. On the other hand, I'm
> not really a gmail user,
On Sb, 27 oct 12, 10:00:46, David Bremner wrote:
>
> As I said (or tried to say), in my opinion, duplication with an external
> package is not the main issue; I think moving features into the core
> when appropriate is a normal development process. On the other hand, I'm
> not really a gmail user,
On Mi, 01 aug 12, 13:24:24, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2012, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >
> > Also, if you've further comments on the patch, do not hesitate!
>
> I'm guessing you get the duplicates because you have dupes in the mail
> store, and 'notmuch search --output=files' prints al
On Mi, 01 aug 12, 13:24:24, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2012, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >
> > Also, if you've further comments on the patch, do not hesitate!
>
> I'm guessing you get the duplicates because you have dupes in the mail
> store, and 'notmuch search --output=files' prints al
Hi,
Im sorting my mailing lists with generic maildrop rules like this one:
if (/^List-Id:.*/)
to Maildir/.debian.$MATCH1/
However, I'm subscribed to a *lot* of mailing lists and in order to keep
my folder view sane I use symlinks to conflate some of them, e.g.
.debian.devel-announ
Hi,
Im sorting my mailing lists with generic maildrop rules like this one:
if (/^List-Id:.*/)
to Maildir/.debian.$MATCH1/
However, I'm subscribed to a *lot* of mailing lists and in order to keep
my folder view sane I use symlinks to conflate some of them, e.g.
.debian.devel-announ
On Jo, 29 mar 12, 07:34:15, David Bremner wrote:
> We could give it a try and see how it works. I suspect it needs the
> assistance of one of the notmuch list moderators (which I understand we
> have delegates for as of a few days ago) to get the BTS able to send to
> the list. Any Debian savvy vo
On Jo, 29 mar 12, 07:34:15, David Bremner wrote:
> We could give it a try and see how it works. I suspect it needs the
> assistance of one of the notmuch list moderators (which I understand we
> have delegates for as of a few days ago) to get the BTS able to send to
> the list. Any Debian savvy vo
On Sb, 17 mar 12, 13:16:47, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei POPESCU on Mar 17 at 4:40 pm:
> > > > As I see it, the manpage (specifically section 'SEARCH SYNTAX' needs to
> > > > be expanded somewhat and 'help search-terms' shortened (a lot
On Vi, 16 mar 12, 20:20:17, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> It is, quite literally, the manpage. notmuch execs man when you run
> notmuch help.
Aha.
> This was an intentional change a few releases ago. Previously, we did
> have separate manpages and internal help documentation and it didn't
> work
On Sb, 17 mar 12, 13:16:47, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei POPESCU on Mar 17 at 4:40 pm:
> > > > As I see it, the manpage (specifically section 'SEARCH SYNTAX' needs to
> > > > be expanded somewhat and 'help search-terms' shortened (a lot
On Vi, 16 mar 12, 20:20:17, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> It is, quite literally, the manpage. notmuch execs man when you run
> notmuch help.
Aha.
> This was an intentional change a few releases ago. Previously, we did
> have separate manpages and internal help documentation and it didn't
> work
On Jo, 15 mar 12, 22:11:24, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei POPESCU on Mar 16 at 2:30 am:
> >
> > $ notmuch help search-terms | wc -l
> > 88
> >
> > IMHO that text is better suited for a manpage, the help should be just a
> > (very short) refere
On Jo, 15 mar 12, 22:11:24, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei POPESCU on Mar 16 at 2:30 am:
> >
> > $ notmuch help search-terms | wc -l
> > 88
> >
> > IMHO that text is better suited for a manpage, the help should be just a
> > (very short) refere
On Jo, 15 mar 12, 17:11:08, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> I think having two divergent documents covering the same thing is less
> than ideal, but perhaps they could be merged in the near future.
I want to have this page more or less complete and descriptive. Once
this is done I should be able to r
On Jo, 15 mar 12, 17:11:08, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> I think having two divergent documents covering the same thing is less
> than ideal, but perhaps they could be merged in the near future.
I want to have this page more or less complete and descriptive. Once
this is done I should be able to r
On Ma, 17 ian 12, 17:29:23, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei Popescu on Jan 18 at 12:14 am:
> >
> > If I get around to write something myself where do you suggest I should
> > start, the wiki or the manpage?
>
> Probably expanding man/man7/notmuch-search-terms
On Ma, 17 ian 12, 17:29:23, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei Popescu on Jan 18 at 12:14 am:
> >
> > If I get around to write something myself where do you suggest I should
> > start, the wiki or the manpage?
>
> Probably expanding man/man7/notmuch-search-terms
On Lu, 16 ian 12, 21:34:31, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei Popescu on Jan 16 at 10:21 pm:
> > This is also interesting:
> > $ notmuch count 'debian'
> > 65888
> > $ notmuch count 'dEbian'
> > 65888
> > $ notmuch count 'Deb
On Lu, 16 ian 12, 21:34:31, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Andrei Popescu on Jan 16 at 10:21 pm:
> > This is also interesting:
> > $ notmuch count 'debian'
> > 65888
> > $ notmuch count 'dEbian'
> > 65888
> > $ notmuch count 'Deb
On Lu, 16 ian 12, 18:26:21, David Bremner wrote:
>
> You have to delve into the mysteries of xapian query parsing
> unfortunately.
Aha, after a quick (web) search I found:
http://xapian.org/docs/queryparser.html
Am I correct to assume this is "the" reference I was looking for?
> The short answe
On Du, 15 ian 12, 17:07:36, mailinglists at nawaz.org wrote:
>
> Use '*'.
>
> For example, Obam* should match "Obama".
Hmm...
$ notmuch count 'Debian'
65888
$ notmuch count '*ebian'
3
$ notmuch count '?ebian'
3
$ notmuch count 'ebian'
3
$ notmuch count '0ebian'
0
As far as I can tell, anything
On Lu, 16 ian 12, 18:26:21, David Bremner wrote:
>
> You have to delve into the mysteries of xapian query parsing
> unfortunately.
Aha, after a quick (web) search I found:
http://xapian.org/docs/queryparser.html
Am I correct to assume this is "the" reference I was looking for?
> The short answe
On Du, 15 ian 12, 17:07:36, mailingli...@nawaz.org wrote:
>
> Use '*'.
>
> For example, Obam* should match "Obama".
Hmm...
$ notmuch count 'Debian'
65888
$ notmuch count '*ebian'
3
$ notmuch count '?ebian'
3
$ notmuch count 'ebian'
3
$ notmuch count '0ebian'
0
As far as I can tell, anything th
Hi everybody,
I'm using notmuch 0.10.2 from Debian backports with Stefano Zacchiroli's
mutt integration (but I've also tried the command line interface).
After reading all the docs and a few experiments I don't see how to do
searches on partial words. If I missed the fine manual mentioning that
Hi everybody,
I'm using notmuch 0.10.2 from Debian backports with Stefano Zacchiroli's
mutt integration (but I've also tried the command line interface).
After reading all the docs and a few experiments I don't see how to do
searches on partial words. If I missed the fine manual mentioning that
48 matches
Mail list logo