On Sep 3, 2007, at 7:43 PM, Andrea Valle wrote:
> In my last post I was saying that I'm tinkering about the idea of
> using Lulu.
> It seems to be difficult with ConTeXt:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lulu.com#_note-3
>
> (Lack of full support for open formats)
Hmm. I know that this:
http:
In my last post I was saying that I'm tinkering about the idea of
using Lulu.
It seems to be difficult with ConTeXt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lulu.com#_note-3
(Lack of full support for open formats)
Best
-a-
--
Andrea Valle
---
Hi to all,
after some "eccentric" projects (musical notation, presentations,
posters...) I'm starting my first "core" project with ConTeXt.
We have a review here at the university which has been published
until now by a publisher. As we are having bad typography and bad
distribution, and,
2007/9/3, Steffen Wolfrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> please have a look at this minimal example:
>
> \starttext
> This is a test text\footnote[129]{for testing} with two footnotes
> \footnote[130]{the same purpose as fn. \note[129]}.
> \stoptext
>
>
> It would look better if "fn. 1" would be
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example:
\starttext
This is a test text\footnote[129]{for testing} with two footnotes
\footnote[130]{the same purpose as fn. \note[129]}.
\stoptext
It would look better if "fn. 1" would be set the same type (not "1"
being smaller and set high).
Is ther
2007/8/29, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I missed some of the excitement of the last two weeks because I was
> > away. I tested the latest versions of ConTeXt and luatex and have
> > some problems:
> >
> > 1. Is there a simple switch to between luat
