Hi John,
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:24:20 -0600, John Culleton
wrote:
How do I express this with the "th" in a smaller
font and elevated? It is a character in the font.
If the 'th' is *not* a character in the font, then
16\high{th}
If the 'th' is a single unicode character in the font, just
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:24:20 -0400
John Culleton wrote:
>
> How do I express this with the "th" in a smaller
> font and elevated? It is a character in the
> font.
Already answered My apologies. I couldn't find
the answer to my request of August 25(th!) But I
sumbled across it today.
--
John C
How do I express this with the "th" in a smaller
font and elevated? It is a character in the font.
--
John Culleton
Wexford Press
Book layout, typesetting and Indexing
Free list of books for self-publishers:
http://wexfordpress.net/shortlist.html
__
Hello Mari,
I can see two ways:
1. Enclose each table into \bgroup ... \egroup scope, so all \setupTABLE will
be treated local (table_test.mkiv).
2. Perform all setups right after \bTABLE (table_test2.mkiv). This is not
applicable in all cases (e.g. \bTABLE[width=\textwidth] must be done here
I seem to remember that it was possible to place a figure over the whole width
of the page inside columns as for example
\startsimplecolumns[n=2]
text in 2 columns
placefigure-over-fullwidth
further text in 2 columns
\stopsimplecolumns
However, I cannot find with what command this was accomplish
Hello!
I have a bit of a table mystery. It seems that the setups of an
earlier table interfere with the table coming after it (in the real
thing there's text between the tables, but the behaviour is the same).
Each table looks fine by itself, but if I compile a file with both,
the second one looks