Hi Aditya,
thank you very much, now I need to specify the alignment only for one "column"
and it gets applied for all of them. However, there is still the problem with
the standard setting of the alignment. For example,
\starttext
\startformula \startalign[m=2, align={right,left}]
\NC ab \NC = c
On Fri, 1 Jan 2021, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/1/2021 8:21 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> > \startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=8em,n=5,
> > align={right,middle,middle,middle,left, right,middle,middle,middle,left}]
> > \NC 0 \NC < \NC 2x + 5y \NC < \NC 10
> > \NC 4 \NC < \NC 3x + y \NC < \NC 9 \NR
>
On 1/1/2021 8:21 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=8em,n=5,
align={right,middle,middle,middle,left, right,middle,middle,middle,left}]
\NC 0 \NC < \NC 2x + 5y \NC < \NC 10
\NC 4 \NC < \NC 3x + y \NC < \NC 9 \NR
\NC 3 \NC < \NC 2y + 3z \NC < \NC 15
\NC 10\NC < \NC 8y
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Johann Birnick wrote:
> Okay, but I think it's a bug, because as you see in the linked pdf it worked
> the
> simple way some years ago...
Yes, something has changed internally. Earlier, if you used:
\startalign[align={right,left}, n=4]
...
\stopalign
then the alignment wa
The developers might tune in; perhaps it was changed.
> On 30 Dec 2020, at 15:01, Johann Birnick wrote:
>
> Okay, but I think it's a bug, because as you see in the linked pdf it worked
> the
> simple way some years ago...
___
Okay, but I think it's a bug, because as you see in the linked pdf it worked the
simple way some years ago...
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 14:38 +0100, Hans Åberg wrote:
> One has to indicate the align pattern for all columns, otherwise it defaults
> to left, it seems:
>
> \starttext
>
> \startformula
One has to indicate the align pattern for all columns, otherwise it defaults to
left, it seems:
\starttext
\startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=8em,n=5,
align={right,middle,middle,middle,left,right,middle,middle,middle,left}]
\NC 0 \NC < \NC 2x + 5y \NC < \NC 10
\NC 4 \NC < \NC 3x + y \NC < \N
Hi Alain,
I don't know what you mean by "you have two position in the second and one in
the first" ?
The 4 is not aligned correctly. Please see
https://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf where the example comes from.
The output looks different.
Best regards,
Johann
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 1
Hi Johann,
The 4 is right aligned, but for this
column you have two position in the second and one in the first.
You could try ~4 and it will align
with 10.
Best regards,
Alain
Le 29/12/2020 à 22:27, Johann Birnick a
écrit :
Hi Otared,
I'm using the same version. The problem is the "right"-alignment. See the 4 on
the right side. It should be right-aligned. I attached my pdf.
Best regards,
Johann
On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 21:37 +0100, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Johann,
>
> The example you sent works fine here with LMTX
Hi Johann,
The example you sent works fine here with LMTX version 2020.12.28 01:41.
Which version of ConTeXt are you using ?
Best regards: Otared
> On 29 Dec 2020, at 14:36, Johann Birnick wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I noticed that Math align is not working properly. In particular I mean the
> a
Hi there,
I noticed that Math align is not working properly. In particular I mean the
alignment. For example, the following code
\starttext
\startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=8em,n=5,
align={right,middle,middle,middle,left
12 matches
Mail list logo