On 9-12-2011 22:01, Marco wrote:
On 2011-12-09 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9-12-2011 20:41, Marco wrote:
One feature request: Could it be make configurable to
either insert a \times or a \cdot?
is already possible
How?
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/units-mkiv.pdf
--
On 2011-12-09 Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 9-12-2011 20:41, Marco wrote:
>
> > One feature request: Could it be make configurable to
> > either insert a \times or a \cdot?
>
> is already possible
How?
___
If your
On 9-12-2011 20:41, Marco wrote:
One feature request: Could it be make configurable to
either insert a \times or a \cdot?
is already possible
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
On 2011-12-09 Hans Hagen wrote:
> > \unit{3.4e-5} yields to 3.4⁻⁵ that's expected according to
> > the manual. But how to get 3.4·10⁻⁵ (either with \cot or
> > \times)?
>
> indeed .. here's the fix
>
> \unexpanded\def\digitspower#1%
>{\times10\digits_raised{#1}}
>
> \unexpanded\def\digit
On 7-12-2011 22:27, Marco wrote:
There seems to be a bug in the new unit system for \unit{kbit}:
% bit
\unit{kilo bit} % kbit
\unit{kilobit} % kbit
\unit{kbit} % kB, shouldn't this be kbit?
Another thing:
\unit{3.4e-5} yields to 3.4⁻⁵ that's expected according to
the manual. But how t
I solved this = getting what I wanted by writing my own macro:
\define[3]\physicalquantitye{\hbox{#1 \times \unit{10^#2 #3}}}
% \physicalquantitye{number}{exponent}{unit} -- gives short form of unit
That makes sense to me and is working fine.
There are a few more like this on the wiki (units
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 00:12, Marco wrote:
>> On 2011-12-07 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>>> > \unit{3.4e-5} yields to 3.4⁻⁵ that's expected
>>> > according to the manual.
>>>
>>> But the behaviour is wrong.
>>
>> I don't know if it's w
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 00:12, Marco wrote:
> On 2011-12-07 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> > \unit{3.4e-5} yields to 3.4⁻⁵ that's expected
>> > according to the manual.
>>
>> But the behaviour is wrong.
>
> I don't know if it's wrong.
But 5e3 would render 5^3 which is hopefully still 125.
> I
On 2011-12-07 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 22:27, Marco wrote:
> > There seems to be a bug in the new unit system for \unit{kbit}:
> >
> > % bit
> > \unit{kilo bit} % kbit
> > \unit{kilobit} % kbit
> > \unit{kbit} % kB, shouldn't this be kbit?
>
> kB is kilobyte, not k
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 22:27, Marco wrote:
> There seems to be a bug in the new unit system for \unit{kbit}:
>
> % bit
> \unit{kilo bit} % kbit
> \unit{kilobit} % kbit
> \unit{kbit} % kB, shouldn't this be kbit?
kB is kilobyte, not kilobit, but "kb" is probably also valid?
> Another thin
There seems to be a bug in the new unit system for \unit{kbit}:
% bit
\unit{kilo bit} % kbit
\unit{kilobit} % kbit
\unit{kbit} % kB, shouldn't this be kbit?
Another thing:
\unit{3.4e-5} yields to 3.4⁻⁵ that's expected according to
the manual. But how to get 3.4·10⁻⁵ (either with \cot o
11 matches
Mail list logo
