Re: [Numpy-discussion] Does a `mergesorted` function make sense?
On 02/09/2014 8:40 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com mailto:hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Charles R Harris
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río
jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think about the suggestion of timsort? One would need to
concatenate the arrays before sorting, but it should
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure about the hashing. Indeed one can also build an index of a set
by means of a hash table, but its questionable if this leads to improved
performance over performing an argsort. Hashing may have
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río
jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure about the hashing. Indeed one can also build an index of a set
by means of a hash table, but its questionable
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:26 AM, cjw c...@ncf.ca wrote:
These are good issues, that need to be discussed and resolved. Python has
the benefit of having a BDFL. Numpy has no similar arrangement.
In the post-numarray period, Travis Oliphant took that role and advanced
the package in many ways.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río
jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:26 AM, cjw c...@ncf.ca wrote:
These are good issues, that need to be discussed and resolved. Python
has the benefit of having a BDFL. Numpy has no similar arrangement.
In the
What should be the value of `2**np.int_(-32)`?
It is apparently currently computed as `1. / (2**np.int_(32))`,
so the computation overflows (when a C long is 32 bits).
I would have hoped for it to be computed as `1./(2.**np.int_(32))`.
Cheers,
Alan Isaac
Hi All,
I'd like to give Jaime commit rights. Having at three active developers
with commit rights is the goal and Jaime has been pretty consistent with
code submissions and discussion participation.
Thoughts?
Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to give Jaime commit rights. Having at three active developers with
commit rights is the goal and Jaime has been pretty consistent with code
submissions and discussion participation.
+1
--
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to give Jaime commit rights. Having at three active developers
with
commit rights is the goal and Jaime has been
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
What should be the value of `2**np.int_(-32)`?
It is apparently currently computed as `1. / (2**np.int_(32))`,
so the computation overflows (when a C long is 32 bits).
I would have hoped for it to be computed as
+1; though I am relatively new to the scene, Jaime's contributions have
always stood out to me as thoughtful.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:47
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com wrote:
+1; though I am relatively new to the scene, Jaime's contributions have
always stood out to me as thoughtful.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think the ayes will have it.
As I told Chuck (because I now get to call Charles Chuck, right? :-)), I am
not sure I am fully qualified for the job: looking at the names on that
list is a humbling experience.
14 matches
Mail list logo
