On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
> [clip]
> >>> Sure. This list actually deserves a long writeup about that.
> >>> First, there wasn't a "Cython-refactor" of NumPy. There was a
> >>> Cython-refactor of SciPy. I'm not sure o
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
> [clip]
Sure. This list actually deserves a long writeup about that.
First, there wasn't a "Cython-refactor" of NumPy. There was a
Cython-refactor of SciPy. I'm not sure
19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
[clip]
>>> Sure. This list actually deserves a long writeup about that.
>>> First, there wasn't a "Cython-refactor" of NumPy. There was a
>>> Cython-refactor of SciPy. I'm not sure of it's current status.
>>> I'm still very supportive of that so