Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy Cython refactor

2012-02-19 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > 19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti: > [clip] > >>> Sure. This list actually deserves a long writeup about that. > >>> First, there wasn't a "Cython-refactor" of NumPy. There was a > >>> Cython-refactor of SciPy. I'm not sure o

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy Cython refactor

2012-02-19 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > 19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti: > [clip] Sure.  This list actually deserves a long writeup about that. First, there wasn't a "Cython-refactor" of NumPy.   There was a Cython-refactor of SciPy.   I'm not sure

[Numpy-discussion] Scipy Cython refactor

2012-02-19 Thread Pauli Virtanen
19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti: [clip] >>> Sure. This list actually deserves a long writeup about that. >>> First, there wasn't a "Cython-refactor" of NumPy. There was a >>> Cython-refactor of SciPy. I'm not sure of it's current status. >>> I'm still very supportive of that so