> On Aug. 9, 2017, 6:24 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Thanks for contributing to Okular :)
> >
> > Why would you need a different background color?
>
> Albert Freeman wrote:
> I personally much prefer black as a background color.
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Maybe you could
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651
Anderson Medeiros Gomes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amg1...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651
--- Comment #1 from Nate Graham ---
Is this caused 100% by https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23108? Or
are there other things that need to be done if/once poppler adds appearance
streams for rubber stamps?
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301774
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315552
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335045
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353400
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159005
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159007
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275371
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330518
--- Comment #6 from Nate Graham ---
Looks like that patch never made it in, so this request is still available for
people to work on.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383649
--- Comment #2 from Nate Graham ---
Thanks Albert. I was able to use it successfully! It could be made a bit more
discoverable, though. For that, I have filed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383652
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363298
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383652
Bug ID: 383652
Summary: Okular stamp tool's custom image support could be more
discoverable
Product: okular
Version: 1.0.0
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651
Bug ID: 383651
Summary: Custom/image stamp annotations are not saved into the
PDF file in a way that can be printed or that other
readers can see
Product: okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358057
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361292
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370382
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383649
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383649
Bug ID: 383649
Summary: Okular stamp tool doesn't allow the use of arbitrary
images, only a fixed list
Product: okular
Version: 1.0.0
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
> On ago. 16, 2017, 9:58 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > What do they use instead of khtml? Some other html renderer?
>
> Gilbert Assaf wrote:
> QtWebKit
Do we want to use that? Or do maybe as a second step? I.e. this first and then
evaluate if we want to move to qtwekbit?
Also what
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383589
Henrik (rkflx) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
> On Aug. 16, 2017, 9:58 nachm., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > What do they use instead of khtml? Some other html renderer?
QtWebKit
- Gilbert
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
24 matches
Mail list logo