Dear Georg,
-1-
When interpreting text from standards it is a useful practice to look
at the definitions.
3.9
electronic health record (EHR) - for integrated care (ICEHR)
a repository of information regarding the health status of a subject
of care in computer processable form,
stored and
Georg Duftschmid wrote:
So I have the impression that an EHR reference model helps to achieve
some kind of advanced functional interoperability, but I would not
say that it is REQUIRED to achieve functional interoperability
(refering to the PDF-exchange as a counter-example).
*
no
Dear all,
I would like to ask you for your opinion on a statement in ISO/DTR 20514
(Definition, scope and context of the EHR), which says that [...] a
standardised EHR reference model is required for achieving functional
interoperability [...] (page 7 of ISO 20514).
Functional
Dear Georg,
Op 24-jun-2008, om 12:16 heeft Georg Duftschmid het volgende geschreven:
I am now wondering why an EHR reference model is seen to be
REQUIRED for achieving functional interoperability. If I exchange
bare PDF-documents (without any describing metadata) between two
EHR
Hi Georg,
I agree with your argument.
Distinguishing advanced functional interoperability from PDF like
functional interoperability is helpful as the information can be
presented in a more or less customised way leveraging the underlying
RM classes - Ocean's EHRview
hi Thilo
I would like to ask you for your opinion on a statement in ISO/DTR 20514
(Definition, scope and context of the EHR), which says that [...] a
standardised EHR reference model is required for achieving functional
interoperability [...] (page 7 of ISO 20514).
Functional
6 matches
Mail list logo