Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:33 +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/06/2011 15:30, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:02 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > >> As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded > >> systems? > >> > >> If I am doing an embedded

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
On 06/21/2011 06:33 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: Hi, On 21/06/2011 15:30, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:02 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded systems? If I am doing an embedded system I know the target hardware, a

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi, On 21/06/2011 15:30, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:02 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded systems? If I am doing an embedded system I know the target hardware, and there is no need to have e.g. both 32 and

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/21/11 9:32 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On 06/21/2011 05:14 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> We've been experimenting with multilib and I now feel it right to >> discuss the changes a bit further now there is something to discuss :). >> The work so far on this is available on the branch: >> >> http://git

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
On 06/21/2011 05:14 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: We've been experimenting with multilib and I now feel it right to discuss the changes a bit further now there is something to discuss :). The work so far on this is available on the branch: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rpu

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/21/11 8:02 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded > systems? > > If I am doing an embedded system I know the target hardware, and there is no > need to have e.g. both 32 and 64 bit libs. 64-bit database on a 32-bit system. 64-

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 14:28 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 21 jun 2011, om 14:14 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > > We've been experimenting with multilib and I now feel it right to > > discuss the changes a bit further now there is something to discuss :). > > The work so far on th

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:02 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded > systems? > > If I am doing an embedded system I know the target hardware, and there > is no need to have e.g. both 32 and 64 bit libs. This has been mentioned be

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded systems? If I am doing an embedded system I know the target hardware, and there is no need to have e.g. both 32 and 64 bit libs. Frans. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedde

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 14:14 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > We've been experimenting with multilib and I now feel it right to > discuss the changes a bit further now there is something to discuss :). > The work so far on this is available on the branch: > > http://git.yoctoproject.o

[OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
We've been experimenting with multilib and I now feel it right to discuss the changes a bit further now there is something to discuss :). The work so far on this is available on the branch: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rpurdie/ml There have been a few issues and some l