On 11/1/12, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> If this is holding up someone else who wants to do real work of porting
> dependency software (Gnome 3, etc.) contact me off list and I'll see if I
> can either allocate some weekend/evening time to do the work myself,
> or provide guidance to someone else who
On Nov 1, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On 2012-11-01 01:47, Richard Elling wrote:
>> Finally, a data point: using MTU of 1500 with ixgbe you can hit wire speed
>> on a
>> modern CPU.
>
>> There is no CSMA/CD on gigabit and faster available from any vendor today.
>> Everything today is
On 11/ 1/12 02:20 PM, Irek Szczesniak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
>> from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move
>> to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies ...
>>
>> Gnome 2 is no longer changing, and no longer being patched ..
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
> from what I remember of the conversations of the time, we cannot move
> to Gnome 3 because of certain Linux dependencies ...
>
> Gnome 2 is no longer changing, and no longer being patched ...
The problem with Gnome 3 is AFAIK mostly a probl
Yet I remember OpenWindows... Quite distinctive.
WindowMaker sounds good. Used it for a while a few years ago. Been thinking
about looking at it again. :)
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.o
I do not feel similarly :)
if it didn't feature a GUI we wouldn't notice or care.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Thank you for the suggestion.
I have not tried this yet, but I have tried to make user a role, which
effectively disables login. Don't know whether smb share is still
working in this scenario. Actually I am not able to connect to smb share
from Windows machine in *any* case :(
The http://wik
On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
> Gnome 2 is perfect (apart from a few annoying bugs), Gnome3/Unity
> would be a drawback indeed, and nobody here wants to go back to
> such basic stuff as xfce and other incapable desktop systems (KDE
> may would be an option). As long as g
>
> +1. There are alot of very useful desktop operating systems already,
> so i see no point in OI trying to compete with them. In business
This way of thinking is responsible for what happened to Solaris.
No OI should be a server and a desktop system. Otherwise, OI will
die pretty soon.
A
On 1 November 2012 14:56, Ron Parker wrote:
> Maybe I'm the oddball in the bunch. But I've been running OpenIndiana
> as my "desktop" OS on my laptop at work since OI-147 was released two
> years ago. Why?
>
I would like to butt in and say that I'm one of the mad ones that use
OI on a laptop, it
On 11/ 1/12 03:56 PM, Ron Parker wrote:
Maybe I'm the oddball in the bunch. But I've been running OpenIndiana
as my "desktop" OS on my laptop at work since OI-147 was released two
years ago.
...
> There is no reason OI could not make a good
working desktop. It's been fine for my needs for two y
Maybe I'm the oddball in the bunch. But I've been running OpenIndiana
as my "desktop" OS on my laptop at work since OI-147 was released two
years ago. Why?
I don't care about shiny new UI gloss, but I have to have a stable
system. What do I mean by that? One that can run stably without
rebooting
**Disclaimer: I've posted a similar question in illumos-team mailing list,
however I'm reposting here since this mailing list seems much more active**
Hello,
I've been trying a new feature on my BIOS that allows to memory map PCI device
registers to spaces above 4G.
However, when I booted in S
On 2012-11-01 01:47, Richard Elling wrote:
Finally, a data point: using MTU of 1500 with ixgbe you can hit wire speed on a
modern CPU.
There is no CSMA/CD on gigabit and faster available from any vendor today.
Everything today is switched.
Ok then, I'll stand corrected by the practice, altho
14 matches
Mail list logo
