The question was, in what way does your patch make things better?
Since there was no answer for quite a while, I assumed the question
wouldn't be answered, and decided to resolve the ticket. Wrongly,
it now seems, so I'll reopen it and let you answer the question.
[levitte - Thu Oct 10 23:4
So, did the patch get put in, or was it useless?
-chris
"Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Oct 10 23:29:14 2002]:
>
> > a question which was never CC'd to me. Also I'm not sure what is
> the
> > meaning of these two entries:
> >
> > Tue Aug 13
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Oct 10 23:29:14 2002]:
> a question which was never CC'd to me. Also I'm not sure what is
the
> meaning of these two entries:
>
> Tue Aug 13 17:52:03 2002
> jaenicke - Milestone 0.9.6h added
>
> Tue Aug 13 17:52:13 2002
> jaenicke - Subsystem Build added
Oh,
Hi
I just went to the RT URL you sent me, and I'm not clear on what
actually happened with my request. At some point someone posted
a question which was never CC'd to me. Also I'm not sure what is the
meaning of these two entries:
Tue Aug 13 17:52:03 2002
jaenicke - Milestone 0.9.6h ad
Thanks very much for your reply, Jeffery.
Our initial note may have led you to believe that a wholesale replacement of Kerberos
encryption with SSL encryption was being considered beyond the customer's application.
That was my wording error. The customer simply wants to use SSL for their
app
We ran the 'make report' and it looks like there are some bugs.
I did review Ticket #243 titled 'OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390' in the rt
database.
1. Compiler: FSUM3012 Specify at least one source, archive, or object operand
to be processed.
This is not an issue as per the abov
The answer is:
MIT DES
and
OpenSSL DES
use different internal representations of the data. You cannot
replace the MIT DES with OpenSSL DES unless you also recompile MIT
Kerberos 4 to use the OpenSSL DES as well.
Several people have done it in the past but it is not recommended.
OpenSS
Title: DES_CBC_CKSUM in SSL and Kerberos.
Hi,
I have a customer with a Kerberos V4 application who is trying to decide if they can substitute their existing Kerberos V4 DES encryption capability with SSL's DES encryption support. When calling DES_CBC_CKSUM() from the Kerberos library,
> I think that it is not a good idea to go back to the old definition.
You're right; I wasn't thinking clearly yesterday :-)
--
Harald Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"It takes a child to raze a village."
-Michael T. Fry
Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
>
> Please test the latest snapshot and check if the solution
> implemented there works for you.
>
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Aug 27 14:12:50 2002]:
>
Sorry for my late answer.
I have tested snapshot
ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/openssl-SNAP-20021009.tar.gz
There, I finally got the time to put this in. Just commited.
Please test the next 0.9.7 snapshot and make sure I got it all right.
This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Sep 30 18:55:14 2002]:
> Any chance of making progress on this?
>
> As a reminder, the issue is that the
11 matches
Mail list logo