On May 31, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[tue...@fh-muenster.de - Sun May 31 16:11:06 2009]:
Dear all,
please find attached a patch which adds support for ECDHE and PSK
support for DTLS as requested by Stephen.
The diff is against openssl-1.0.0-beta2.
In future please make
> [tue...@fh-muenster.de - Sun May 31 16:11:06 2009]:
>
> Dear all,
>
> please find attached a patch which adds support for ECDHE and PSK
> support for DTLS as requested by Stephen.
>
> The diff is against openssl-1.0.0-beta2.
>
In future please make diffs against the relevant branch as oppose
Dear all,
please find attached a patch which adds support for ECDHE and PSK
support for DTLS as requested by Stephen.
The diff is against openssl-1.0.0-beta2.
Stephen: Please let me know if you have any issues with the patch.
Best regards
Michael
dtls.patch
Description: Binary data
On Ma
> [steve - Wed May 13 14:29:35 2009]:
>
> > [danie...@sent.com - Thu May 07 12:40:28 2009]:
> >
> > I hope that somebody can fix that problem or at least print out a log
> > message saying "No DTLS support for ECDHE"
> >
>
> This looks like this bit of DTLS code hasn't been updated for 1.0.0 .
> [danie...@sent.com - Thu May 07 12:40:28 2009]:
>
> I hope that somebody can fix that problem or at least print out a log
> message saying "No DTLS support for ECDHE"
>
This looks like this bit of DTLS code hasn't been updated for 1.0.0 .
The code in question looks like it is similar (identic
Bug report.
openssl-1.0.0-beta2
uname -a
Linux daniel-desktop 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17
01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
OS: Ubuntu 9.04
I built a vanilla openssl-1.0.0-beta2 on a and tried to run
./openssl s_client -dtls1
against
./openssl s_server -dtls1
To my disappoint
