>>> I'd like to request more opinions on
>>> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5427. Key dispute question is
>>> whether or not following fragment should work
>>>
>>> unsigned char *inp = buf, *out = buf;
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++) {
>>> EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, o
> Related
> thing to recognize in the context is that *disputable* condition, the
> one that triggered this discussion, is exercised only when
> ctx->block_size is larger than 1, because then ctx->buf_len remains 0.
I naturally meant "because *otherwise* ctx->buf_len remains 0". In other
words ctx
I thought our travis setup was so that other forks could not send email to our
mailing list.
From: Travis CI
Date: Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 12:19 AM
To: "openssl-comm...@openssl.org"
Subject: [openssl-commits] Still Failing: winnerof2010/openssl#8 (master -
6f7c7aa)
[https://avatars2.github
