On 08/19/2016 12:43 PM, jonetsu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are using FOM 2.0.9 for an embedded product that will go for FIPS
> validation. Validation of the full product, that is. All
> development so far is with 2.0.9. What would be the reasons, if any,
> to update to 2.0.12 before going to the
Hello,
We are using FOM 2.0.9 for an embedded product that will go for FIPS
validation. Validation of the full product, that is. All development so far
is with 2.0.9. What would be the reasons, if any, to update to 2.0.12 before
going to the lab ?
Thanks - comments much appreciated.
--
On 08/19/2016 07:20 AM, Imran Ali wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> I need some help. I am looking for some evidence which I can provide to
> my auditor for FOM 2.0.12 is FIPS-140 compliance when compiled and used
> in Windows environment. When I look at the NIST web site under
>
Hi Guys,
I need some help. I am looking for some evidence which I can provide to my
auditor for FOM 2.0.12 is FIPS-140 compliance when compiled and used in Windows
environment. When I look at the NIST web site under
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/140val-all.htm#1747 I