Verifying hex sha1 signature

") ... % openssl sha1 -verify rsa-pubkey -hex -signature foo.hex foo.txt Verification Failure Failed: exit 1 == AND HERE == I get the same result with the latest sna

Re: Verifying that a private key and certificate match

e value of $? after each command. > (Is it okay to only check the modulus? The public exponent can be > ignored? Is it always "Exponent: 65537 (0x10001)"?) I don't know. -- Keith Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> San Diego Supercomputer Center

Re: 2 is not prime?

; do > /usr/local/apps/openssl-$ver/bin/openssl version > /usr/local/apps/openssl-$ver/bin/openssl prime 2 > done OpenSSL 0.9.7m 23 Feb 2007 2 is not prime OpenSSL 0.9.8 05 Jul 2005 2 is not prime OpenSSL 0.9.8a 11 Oct 2005 2 is not prime OpenSSL 0.9.8b 04 May 2006 2 is prime $ -- Keith Tho

Re: Post

ce you've now publicly called attention to the fact that this information is out there, I suggest you do so as soon as possible. -- Keith Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> San Diego Supercomputer Center <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst/> 858-822-0853 "We must do something. This is s

Re: New version of OpenSSL not recognised by OS

ncludes OpenSSL 0.9.8b. -- Keith Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> San Diego Supercomputer Center <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst/> 858-822-0853 "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." --

Re: Diff between OpenSSL 0.9.7 and 0.9.8?

y openssl-0.9.8*.tar.gz source distribution; look for "Major changes between OpenSSL 0.9.7g and OpenSSL 0.9.8". -- Keith Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> San Diego Supercomputer Center <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst/> 858-822-0853 "We must do something. This is something.

Re: Unsigned CRL

ps massaging the output. The result isn't strictly speaking a CRL at all, but perhaps it's what you're looking for. -- Keith Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> San Diego Supercomputer Center <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst/> 858-82

Re: SHA1 checksum mismatch on openssl-0.9.8f tarball

w (while I was writing this message). Also, the "openssl-0.9.8f.tar.gz.asc" file is actually a *binary* signature, not an ASCII signature as the name implies. (Previous *.asc files have been ASCII signatures.) -- Keith Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> San Diego Supercomputer C

Re: SHA1 checksum mismatch on openssl-0.9.8f tarball

On Fri 07-10-12 15:02, Keith Thompson wrote: [...] > That's not the only problem. As of a few minutes ago, there were > two versions of the "openssl-0.9.8f.tar.gz.asc" file, one on the ftp > server and another on the web server. Both are signed by the same key > (whic