On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> So I'd rather work on formally splitting the nova-core group into
> smaller topic-oriented review groups, which would ensure that code
> affecting a given area is reviewed by the experts of that area (rather
> than by whoever happens to be o
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2012/3/13 Jesse Andrews :
> > Maybe it is just me, but most reviews seem to take hours to days to
> > complete. I'm been sitting here waiting for a one line change to get
> > a second "+2 / approved" so I can redeploy our test cluster for th
Is this is really a problem that needs solving? I'd like to believe that no
member of Nova Core would approve something that they aren't familiar with.
IMHO, we should be making better attempts at not letting branches sit
around for days/weeks at a time.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Joe Gordo
+1!
--
> *From:*
> openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net[openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=
> rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Matt Dietz [
> matt.di...@rackspace.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 06, 2012 6:48 PM
> *To:* openstack@li
+1!
> I'd like to nominate Johannes for nova-core, as he has definitely been
> doing a good number of reviews lately.
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.
+1!
> Vek has absolutely stepped up and started doing quite few reviews, so I'd
> like to nominate him to be added to nova-core.
>
> Waldon
>
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubs
I prefer how the separate lines look, but it results in having
leading/trailing whitespaces in the docstring. This may not be an issue, but
it's something I've had to work around in the past.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> ++
>
> I also believe the requirements to:
>
> a) H
++
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Brian Waldon wrote:
> I would like to propose we remove our implementation of OSAPI v1.0 from
> Nova for the following reasons:
>
> 1) Our implementation is incomplete, and there are no (visible) plans to
> complete it. Shared IP Groups and Backup Schedules hav
This would make for a perfect pyhole plugin.
https://github.com/jk0/pyhole
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:56 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> Taking a recent example, I think there is a big difference between
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-09-06-20.
+1 for sure
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Brian Waldon wrote:
> Chris (comstud) has been a great help with reviews lately and has quite a
> bit of knowledge of the system overall. I think he would add a great amount
> to the team, so I'm proposing we add him to nova-core.
>
> Brian Waldon
>
>
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:24 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >> In addition, this doesn't prevent anyone on the core team from doing a
> >> straight close and merge of the pull request in
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
The critical point has never been whether we could reliably detect
> people's votes (even though I really dislike parsing free-form text to
> extract critical information like this). Even though Launchpad offers
> voting information in a structu
I don't intend to fan the fumes here, but I think the point we are trying to
make is that the decision to use Gerrit was made before most of the community
was even aware of it -- much less having a chance to come up with a solution
like Sandy did (which, IMHO, is far more practical than the Gerr
++
Either we should use github or we shouldn't (until it meets our requirements).
On Aug 26, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> I'm struggling to find a reason why the Openstack project is using
> github.
>
> The use of Gerrit and other tools has reduced github to being just a
> pret
Good afternoon,
We've just submitted a merge proposal to begin the process of getting
Melange into Nova:
https://code.launchpad.net/~raxnetworking/nova/melange/+merge/71917
This is a very large chunk of code that will no doubt generate many great
ideas and discussions. We're not set in any parti
Hello,
It was decided in our weekly OpenStack meeting that from this point forward,
us developers should make a quick announcement on this ML whenever adding
new dependencies to any OS project -- preferably *before* your branch merges
in trunk. This should make all our jobs a little easier. :)
Th
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 08/09/2011 01:28 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Dan Prince
> wrote:
> >> Couple of comments:
> >>
> >> 1) While gerrit is integrated w/ Launchpad (and can close tickets)
> Launchpad
> >> is not integrated with
Works great!
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> This has now been installed and activated. Anonymous users should be able
> to read the config of any job now. I've got admin access, so it's kinda of
> hard to test - would someone mind verifying that they can, in fact, see th
+1
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
> wrote:
> > While I was checking branch merges, I noticed that Brian Lamar (blamar),
> is not listed as a nova-core developer. This is most definitely a travesty,
> as he has been one of the most prolific coders/reviewers over the past few
In the mean time, I'm working on addressing one of Sandy's issues by making
the client less chatty.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
> Cool ... thanks Gabe.
>
> I agree (and to Ed's point) that having to depend on an external source for
> "close to rock-face" development is to
+1
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Paul Voccio
> wrote:
> > All,
> > I would like to nominate Dan Prince (https://launchpad.net/~dan-prince
> ) for
> > nova-core. He has been a solid contributor in terms of code, reviews and
> > discussions during the summit.
> > Thanks,
> > pvo
> >
> > Confiden
I like this approach.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Ant Messerli wrote:
> So it sounds like the better path would be to just keep two channels for
> now, see how that goes, and then maybe revisit splitting out by project if
> it comes to that in the future?
>
> #openstack - Help and Support
>
Try 'bzr branch' instead of 'pull'.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, andi abes wrote:
> I'm not sure who wins in git vs. bzr ease of use... guess it depends on how
> quickly I get over this error:
>
> $ bzr pull lp:swift/1.3
> bzr: ERROR: Cannot lock LockDir(
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~swift/
+1
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Subject basically says it all. Justin has proven to be a regular and
> thorough reviewer and unless he objects, I propose he join the
> nova-core team as a core reviewer.
>
> -jay
>
> _
Europe would be nice.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Stephen Spector <
stephen.spec...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Developers:
>
> I have started early planning on the next OpenStack Design Summit in early
> October 2011 this year and would like to get some feedback on location
> options. The curr
I'd also like to see it called 'nova'.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Rick Clark wrote:
> I agree the 'os' designation is ambiguous and likely to cause some
> confusion.
>
> On 02/24/2011 04:36 PM, Eric Day wrote:
> > ++
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:33:42PM -0800, Devin Carlen wrote:
> >>
ation of the OpenStack API and keep an official binding
> in lock-step with developments to the API. Any chance of that happening?
>
> Justin
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Josh Kearney wrote:
>
>> Two people may have come into the channel and brought it t
Two people may have come into the channel and brought it to our attention
today, but this was a very recent change. I can assure you there are many
more OS API consumers out there already. It's likely that most just haven't
pulled trunk since it landed.
I think we all agree that a decision on a st
I am all for removing this. It's not something we should have to support --
like you said, it can be done with a simple shell script (*if* that's how
one wants to run it).
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The bin/nova-combined script duplicates code and f
I'd like to volunteer my time to help out with reviews in Nova by becoming a
member of Nova-Core.
-Josh Kearney
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~open
I'm with Sandy on this. I'd like to step in as well.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
> I'll throw my hat in the ring for core if deemed worthy.
>
> Soren's point about 1 review day per # core developers was refreshing. I
> had previously held back from applying because I was a
Out of curiosity -- are we *really* concerned about IE6?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Colin Nicholson <
colin.nichol...@iomart.com> wrote:
> Not sure about StartingPage - it's not all that bad, and could easily
> just be IE6, haven't ever looked at it in IE6 before.
>
> As for the releasesta
Hi,
There has been some discussion lately about the different techniques used to
ensure that PEP8 and unit tests are run before submitting commits, so I
thought I'd whip up a BZR plugin that does this automatically for us, which
can be found at:
https://github.com/jk0/bzr-pre-commit-hook
Hopeful
33 matches
Mail list logo
