+1
This is a good proposal, I also think we should have single fuel-core group
for all repos. In real life core reviewers won't set +2 or merge to repos
with which they are not familiar with.
Regards,
Andrey Maximov
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> w
+1 for merging #fuel #fuel-dev #fuel-python and #fuel-library to #fuel.
Not sure about #fuel-infra though, one of the purposes of #fuel-infra -
support requests to infra team, I think #fuel channel will be too noisy if
we redirect all support requests to it.
Regards,
Andrey
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016
Hi Vladimir,
Till what date do you want FFE ?
Regards,
Andrey Maximov
Fuel Project Manager
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for "Use packetary for
> building ISO". BP [0]
Hi Kirill,
I don't think we can give up on using fqdn node names for RabbitMQ because
we need to support TLS in the future.
Thanks,
Andrey Maximov
Fuel Project Manager
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Kyrylo Galanov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to start discussion regarding the issue we ha
+1 to Igor suggestion to downgrade Postgres to 9.2. Our users don't work
directly with Postgres, so there is no any deprecation of Fuel features.
Maintaining our own custom Postgres package just because we want "JSON
column" is not a rational decision. Come on, fuel is not a billing system
with tho
+1
Regards,
Andrey Maximov
Fuel Project Manager
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Vladimir Kuklin
wrote:
> Folks
>
> This email is a proposal to push Docker containers removal from the master
> node to the date beyond 8.0 HCF.
>
> Here is why I propose to do so.
>
> Removal of Docker is a rather
Hi All,
Centos7 patches were successfully integrated into Fuel 8.0, so we are
removing merge freeze from all repositories according to our plan [1].
Please continue merge as usual.
[1] -
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-December/081026.html
Regards,
Andrey Maximov
Fuel Pro
ec 3, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Maksimov
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> 1. According to CentOS7 Merging plan [1] we assessed list of
> FF exceptions and decided to integrate remaining commits into CentOS7
> merge plan. So if your patch was listed in FF exceptions list please
> contact Dmit
Hi All,
1. According to CentOS7 Merging plan [1] we assessed list of FF exceptions
and decided to integrate remaining commits into CentOS7 merge plan. So if
your patch was listed in FF exceptions list please contact Dmitry Teselkin
to add it in our merge plan.
2. We are freezing all git repositor
Thank you Dmitry for very detailed plan and risks assessment.
Do we want to run swarm against custom iso with centos7 on Thu evening to
measure level of regression? I remember that we were considering this
approach.
Regards,
Andrey Maximov
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrot
Hi Everyone!
I would like to reiterate the bugfix process after Hard Code Freeze.
According to our HCF definition [1] we should only merge fixes for
*Critical* bugs to *stable/7.0* branch, High and lower priority bugs should
NOT be accepted to *stable/7.0* branch anymore.
Also we should accept pat
11 matches
Mail list logo