Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Maru Newby" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > > > - Original Message - > >> From: "Maru Newby" > >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usag

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Sean Dague" > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > On 10/29/2014 07:25 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: > > - Original Message - > >> From: "Maru Newby" > >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > >> > >> > >> Am I the only

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Maru Newby
On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Maru Newby" >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> >> >> Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our >> commit messages sets a bad prece

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/29/2014 07:25 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Maru Newby" >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> >> >> Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our >> commit messages sets a bad precedent? Or

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Maru Newby" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our > commit messages sets a bad precedent? Or was there a discussion on this > topic that I misse

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Sean Dague
Yeh, this seems incredibly poluting, don't do this. That's not something I want in our long term git history without conversation about the policy. Every other Impact flag that we use in OpenStack had a pretty long conversation about it's addition. The issue arrises because the NFV team has create

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-10-29 Thread Maru Newby
Am I the only one wondering whether introducing arbitrary tagging into our commit messages sets a bad precedent? Or was there a discussion on this topic that I missed? Maru On Jun 17, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > Hi, > > There is an action for creating a Gerrit dashboard to sh

[openstack-dev] [NFV] Patches tagging with NFVImpact

2014-06-17 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi, There is an action for creating a Gerrit dashboard to show all NFV-related specs and patches. As it requires to have a specific label for discriminating them, I'm adding "NFVImpact" in all the patches proposed in [1]. The side effect is that it creates another patchset and so runs another Jenk