Hi,
sorry for no feedback, i've been doing more and more test and after enabled
the dnsmasq log i found the error which i'm not longer sure if is related
to having duplicated entries
dnsmasq-dhcp[21231]: 0 DHCPRELEASE(tap8ecf66b6-72) 192.168.111.24
fa:16:3e:72:04:82 unknown lease
Looking around
We've been discussing this for 3 months now, so my vote is "soon". Can we
make the Puppet Labs ML have an auto-responder that redirects people?
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Richard Raseley
wrote:
> Matt Fischer wrote:
>
>> This was my action from the puppet meeting this week, so here's my
>
Matt,
I do understand your concerns and believe me when I said that by no means I am
suggesting to not let people be part of this meet-up. Probably the best way to
deal with oversubscription by the same company is at the OpenStack board level.
Asking them to spread the word to the OpenStack Com
+1 (we had 2 people at the mid-cycle last time, so we would not have been
impacted by this)
When there are multiple 4+ breakout sessions going on at the same time and they
are all (hopefully) relevant to you/your company? I would agree that if
someone had 20+ people from a single company going
Edgar,
> I also wanted to bring to your attention that during the summit the
> attendance was lower that in the mid-cycle one (Philadelphia). Probably
> because there are so many things running in parallel that people just need to
> decide between very important sessions. So, does it make sense
I strongly disagree with a quota system. If for nothing else then that
there's no fair way to do it. But more importantly this is a community, not
a Senate meeting and all contributors should be welcome. How would you
explain to someone who regularly contributes that they cannot attend due to
a quo
I agree with all of these items especially with not having Vendor booths.
The only thing I would want to mention is that it would be great to have
something centrally located within the US, if we are going to choose the US
for a session. That way it is only a 3-4 hour flight instead of a 7-9 hour
I'm very much in favor of scaling up the Ops meetup and doing so with no vendor
booths, modest registration fees, dropping the evening event (if needed), and
creating an alternating North American / other local. I don't know what I can
do specifically to help out here but if I can help, in any w
Tom,
In my opinion, we should not have booths at all. Actually, we should just only
have Operators attending this meetup with a limit of three attendees by
company. During the Philadelphia one I noticed that many of the attendees where
from the same company and I do not believe those companies
I pretty much agree with everyone so far. No vendor booths, distributed
“underwriters”, modest registration fee, and sans evening event. Not sure
separate regional meetings are a good idea, but would be in favor of
alternating North America vs. other region, like the summits.
I’ve been lookin
Hello all,
The os-ansible-deployment/OpenStack-Ansible project is gearing up for a couple
feature drops and looking for reviews from interested people within the greater
deployer/operator/dev community to ensure that we're developing the
features/support people are looking for.
Ceilometer:
If we have more than one live-migration occurring at a time, some will
fail. Basically the concluding handshake won't complete. It's not clear if
this is a contention issue, and issue in Juno (which has some
well-documented messaging problems), or something else.
These issues occur when trying to
RE Evening event: I agree it was pretty crowded. Perhaps just a list of
area venues for various activities and a sign up board somewhere. Let it
happen organically, and everybody is on their own for paying for whatever
they do. That way those that may not be into the bar scene don't feel left
out b
Hi Tom, thanks for bringing up the subject. Like many commenters I share
some of the same views.
I'm very "+1" on preventing vendor booth space from happening. This isn't
an event to sell a product, booth space would be wasted on both the
attendees and the booth staff.
I feel that multiple corpor
On 6/30/15, 11:46 AM, "Matt Fischer" wrote:
>My votes line up with Dave's and Joe's pretty much.
>
>
>I think that vendor booth's are a bad idea as well.
>
>
>As for registration, I think having a fee that covers the meals/coffee is
>fair. This is not a typical walk in off the street meeting. I
We’d like to get a better handle on issues around live migration and I thought
that all of you may be the most knowledgeable people.
1. In your own work do you see issues with live migration? What issues and
how critical are they?
2. How frequently do these issues occur?
3. Wha
My votes line up with Dave's and Joe's pretty much.
I think that vendor booth's are a bad idea as well.
As for registration, I think having a fee that covers the meals/coffee is
fair. This is not a typical walk in off the street meeting. I don't think
many companies would balk at an extra $100-$2
> -1 on paid registration, I think we need to be mindful of the smaller
> openstack deployers, their voice is an important one, and their access to
> the larger operations teams is invaluable to them. I like the idea of
> local teams showing up because it's in the neighborhood and they don't need
Hi everyone,
There was quite a bit of fanfare around the new federation features in
OpenStack Kilo.
In the os-ansible-deployment/openstack-ansible project we've been putting
together a view on how to implement federation with as little complexity as
possible.
We've been working on some prototype
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Joe Topjian wrote:
>
> I wouldn't be opposed to having a paid registration for the meetup. Could
> the amount be polled if paid registration is considered?
>
We (TWC) is also in favor of having paid registration as well as a "slush
fund" for scholarships/fee waiv
+1 on the no booths rule.
-1 on paid registration, I think we need to be mindful of the smaller
openstack deployers, their voice is an important one, and their access to
the larger operations teams is invaluable to them. I like the idea of
local teams showing up because it's in the neighborhood a
Hi Tom,
I think this is a great problem to have. Difficult to solve, but it shows
how popular / important these meetups are.
I'm definitely in favor of a "no booths" type meetup. I feel if a company
wants to sponsor, they're doing it out of good will and any recognition
would come from that.
I'd
Hi Tom, et al,
1) I think corporate operators are fine sponsors (or as I prefer,
underwriters) of the event. But with modest/token acknowledgement only of
their largesse. *
2) No vendor booths. I'm fine with an Oprah sponsorship goodie bag on the
chairs or at registration time, but nothing more o
I use qemu-guest-agent inside of a vm and ensure that the mounts are noatime.
You can then use the guest agent to issue a freeze and get consistent rbd snaps
of the backing devices. Those snaps can be exported, preferably differentially
to skip over the unused portions, off to some other stora
Tom,
First off, thank you for organizing this event. It has proven to be a
success and the growth shows how much interest there is in the community. A
couple of ideas came to mind when I read your e-mail.
What about breaking the event up into regions? Or having additional
sponsors that are users
This isn¹t completely inside of OpenStack, but you can use something like
R1soft that is installed on an instance inside of your cloud then use that
to connect to other instances to bare metal. We (BlackMesh) have then
created a baremetal instance that ceph volumes can be attached to do full
restor
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Brendan Johnson
wrote:
> What are people using to perform image based backups of Windows and Linux VMs
> in OpenStack? I am using KVM as the hypervisor, Ceph for block storage and
> Swift for object storage. I know Cinder can backup volumes that are not in
>
Hi Andreas,
Your guess is right,i forgot to add rules to permit ICMP (ping) :)
Everything is working as expected now.
thank you very much for your response
regards,
Hamza
2015-06-29 14:42 GMT+01:00 Andreas Scheuring :
> Your setup looks fine.
>
> Please check your security groups configurati
28 matches
Mail list logo
