, lede-adm
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:22:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5756c13c.6040...@uid0.hu>
References: <1465294394.3094.78.camel@homehost> <5756c13c.6040...@uid0.hu>
Face:
iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwAQMAAABtzGvEBlBMVEX///8AAABVwtN+eklEQVQY04XQzQ2EIBAF4IdMDIc5UAIlUIKlWMr0ZiMm28jOj+6iMXE
On 2016-06-08 11:12, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
>> Which exact goal are you referring to? Imho a 'split' never happened,
>> everybody kept contributing to both projects.
> Let me argue with that:
>
> 2016-06-07: 08:59 Changeset [49379] by nbd
> treewide: fix replace nbd@… with nbd@… Signed-off-by: …
>
On 8 June 2016 at 11:12, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Daniel Golle wrote:
>> Which exact goal are you referring to? Imho a 'split' never happened,
>> everybody kept contributing to both projects.
>
> Let me argue with that:
>
> 2016-06-07: 08:59 Changeset [49379] by nbd
> treewide: fix replace nbd@… wit
Hey Daniel,
Daniel Golle wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:36PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
...
The official line - which I should have sent out a few days ago - from the
OpenWrt team is:
Felix's initial comment was LEDE to become a "development environment" for
new ideas, and
El 7/6/16 a las 14:42, Zoltan HERPAI escribió:
> Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a few emails on this topic I thought better of sending, but I'm
>> sure I'm not the only one wondering why the remaining OpenWrt devs have
>> not responded to the various LEDE overtures on this mailing lis
