Dear Damian,
with revision 24158 I am getting the following error when I want to run arm.
# ./arm
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./src/starter.py", line 378, in
controller.init(conn)
File "/arm/src/util/torTools.py", line 292, in init
Am Mittwoch, den 17.11.2010, 12:04 -0500 schrieb Roger Dingledine:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:45:32AM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > > I noticed that Tor had crashed on my system. I am using Debian Lenny
> > > with Tor 0.2.1.26-1~~lenny+1. The only thing I could find out about this
> > > crash
Dear Tor folks,
I noticed that Tor had crashed on my system. I am using Debian Lenny
with Tor 0.2.1.26-1~~lenny+1. The only thing I could find out about this
crash is the following line running `dmesg`.
$ dmesg
[…]
[Several of these Treason uncloaked messages as you can s
t
to HTML though.
[…]
I attach a patch for the README file. Those typos have to be corrected
in the Wiki too.
It would be great, if you could put torwatch under version control.
Thanks,
Paul
[1] http://www.atagar.com/arm/
8<------
Am Donnerstag, den 14.10.2010, 08:32 +0200 schrieb Timo Schoeler:
> thus Paul Menzel spake:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 13.10.2010, 10:31 -0400 schrieb Thomas S. Benjamin:
> >
> >> Is your relay running on a virtual machine (V-colo)?
> >
> > Yes, the relay is runnin
Dear Thomas,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.10.2010, 10:31 -0400 schrieb Thomas S. Benjamin:
> Is your relay running on a virtual machine (V-colo)?
Yes, the relay is running on a virtual machine.
> If so, check your user beancounters, they may show you which resources
> are being exhausted.
Xen is used.
Dear Tor folks,
I am still seeing the same problem [1]. In April it used the whole limit
of 1 TB and hibernated after the limit was reached, but afterward it
only came back to around 100 GB per month.
Fast IT is not limiting the bandwidth in any way. I tested that. CPU and
memory are not utilize
Dear Tor folks,
my server plan only includes 1 TB of traffic. Since traffic increased
quite a bit during the last few days [1] I have to limit the volume to
not go bankrupt.
In `man torrc` [2] I found AccountingMax and AccountingStart. My
accounting starts let us say at April 2nd and I just set
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 13:57 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Freitag, den 19.03.2010, 22:08 -0400 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:43:37PM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
> > wrote 1.0K bytes in 37 lines about:
> > : > I s
Am Freitag, den 19.03.2010, 22:08 -0400 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:43:37PM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
> wrote 1.0K bytes in 37 lines about:
> : > I setup a tor relay by just setting
> : > orport, dirport, and nickname and letting it run. It's 0.2.2.9
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
[…]
> I setup a tor relay by just setting
> orport, dirport, and nickname and letting it run. It's 0.2.2.9-alpha.
> We'll see what happens.
Do you have any results yet?
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist
Am Dienstag, den 16.03.2010, 18:51 +0100 schrieb Gitano:
> Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> >>> It is a virtual machine ...
>
> > Is it safe to say, that it is a client problem that they do not use my
> > server?
>
> 1. On vservers there are many reso
Am Freitag, den 12.03.2010, 11:40 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 14:01 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> > Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
> > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0100,
> > > paulepan...@
Am Freitag, den 12.03.2010, 19:31 -0600 schrieb Scott Bennett:
[…]
> Well, as I've pointed out in the past, the values in cached-consensus
> do *not* accurately reflect either the traffic load that your relay has
> carried or the traffic capacity of your relay. They are bogus a priori and
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 14:01 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
> > wrote 1.6K bytes in 52 lines about:
> > : I now incr
Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2010, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Karsten Loesing:
[…]
> I figured out the problem. The metrics portal had the bridge user
> numbers from 2009-11-30 to 2010-01-05 imported twice. This affected all
> countries, but was simply most visible for Chinese bridge users. I
> removed those
Dear Tor folks,
on the Tor start page [1] there is a message »Help us reach 5,000 relays
in 2010!«
On IRC arma discovered an offer by the British ISP Coldbot where you can
buy 1 Mb/s bandwidth for £9 per month [2].
Although it is quite pricey I find the idea very nice.
»I guess for people cari
low 100 KB/s.
>
> What is the network configuration?
$ more /etc/tor/torrc
SocksPort 0 # what port to open for local application
connections
ControlPort 9051
ORPort 443
ORListenAddress 0.0.0.0:9090
Address 62.141.42.186
ContactInfo 1
I now increased the RAM too and restarted the server to no avail. It is
still below 100 KB/s.
Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 12:16 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 23:54 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> > Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 10:17 -0500 schrieb and...@torpr
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 23:54 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 10:17 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:32:59AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
> > wrote 1.4K bytes in 39 lines about:
> > : > What di
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 02:36 -0800 schrieb Paul Campbell:
> > From: Marcin Kowalczyk
> > Sent: Sat, March 6, 2010 7:56:39 AM
> >
> > > Looking at `DataDirectory/state` directly I cannot figure out how to
> > > interpret the values. Maybe I need tot enable bandwidth accounting.
> >
> > The v
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 10:17 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:32:59AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
> wrote 1.4K bytes in 39 lines about:
> : > What did you configure for your bandwidth limits or accountingmax?
> :
> : I did not configure them and
Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2010, 20:17 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:03:22AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
> wrote 1.9K bytes in 66 lines about:
> : I updated to 0.2.1.23 to no avail. It is up for 12 hours again and
> : staying now at 66 KB/s. I also ch
Dear Tor folks,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 01:01 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:45 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:43:13AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > >Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
> > &g
Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2010, 14:18 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Hahn:
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > I updated from 0.2.0.35-1~lenny2 to 0.2.1.23-2~~lenny+1 and use the
> > same
> > configuration. But now I am seeing
> >
> >Your IP
Dear Tor folks,
in [1] option two instructs to use packages from [2]. This gives me
currently version 0.2.1.23-2~~lenny+1 and is as far as I can see based
on the version in Debian Sid/unstable and in `changelog.Debian.gz`
release is set to `lenny-backport`.
Looking at the available packages in t
Dear Tor folks,
I updated from 0.2.0.35-1~lenny2 to 0.2.1.23-2~~lenny+1 and use the same
configuration. But now I am seeing
Your IP address seems to have changed to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. Updating.
every 10 seconds in `/var/log/tor/log`.
I have not found anything on the WWW at a first glance and
Dear Hannah,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:45 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:43:13AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
> >> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >>
Dear Hannah,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >[...]
>
> >I am out of ideas. It would be really nice, if someone could help,
> >because otherwise the paid traffic volume will be wa
Dear Tor folks,
Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 22:21 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> my Tor server is running for over three days now, but the average
> bandwidth usage shown by ARM [1] is only 100 KB/s for uploaded and
> downloaded. The usage increased during the first two days but has
> s
Dear SwissTor,
thank you for your answer.
Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 23:47 +0100 schrieb starslights:
> Well i am not sure but look like you must first upgrade your Tor version to
> the
> last sable minimum 0.2.1.24 who i think will first fix the "xx:xx:xx
> [WARN] Rejecting insecure
Dear Tor folks,
my Tor server is running for over three days now, but the average
bandwidth usage shown by ARM [1] is only 100 KB/s for uploaded and
downloaded. The usage increased during the first two days but has
stagnated now.
I am using the default `/etc/tor/torrc` so bandwidth should be lim
32 matches
Mail list logo
