Hi Ian,
Agreed with all that's said below and will work on the changes, just a
small comment in-line.
On 11/01/2019 12:26, Ian Stokes wrote:
> On 1/10/2019 4:58 PM, Tiago Lam wrote:
>> Previously, TSO was being explicity disabled on vhost interfaces,
>> meaning the guests wouldn't have TSO suppor
On 1/11/2019 12:26 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
On 1/10/2019 4:58 PM, Tiago Lam wrote:
Previously, TSO was being explicity disabled on vhost interfaces,
meaning the guests wouldn't have TSO support negotiated in. With TSO
negotiated and enabled, packets are now marked for TSO, through the
PKT_TX_TCP_SE
On 1/10/2019 4:58 PM, Tiago Lam wrote:
Previously, TSO was being explicity disabled on vhost interfaces,
meaning the guests wouldn't have TSO support negotiated in. With TSO
negotiated and enabled, packets are now marked for TSO, through the
PKT_TX_TCP_SEG flag.
In order to deal with this type o
Previously, TSO was being explicity disabled on vhost interfaces,
meaning the guests wouldn't have TSO support negotiated in. With TSO
negotiated and enabled, packets are now marked for TSO, through the
PKT_TX_TCP_SEG flag.
In order to deal with this type of packets, a new function,
netdev_dpdk_pr