> On 16 Oct 2023, at 14:48, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 10/6/23 20:10, Алексей Кашавкин via discuss wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I am using OVS with DPDK in OpenStack. This is RDO+TripleO deployment with
>> the Train release. I am trying to measure the performance of the DPDK
>> compute node. I ha
On 10/6/23 20:10, Алексей Кашавкин via discuss wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am using OVS with DPDK in OpenStack. This is RDO+TripleO deployment with
> the Train release. I am trying to measure the performance of the DPDK compute
> node. I have created two VMs [1], one as a DUT with DPDK and one as a tr
Thanks for all your insightful comments.
All make sense to me, and also allowed me to think on my next moves.
Thank you so much, Ilya.
If I progress in this regards, I will come back to you guys.
Cheers,
levi
On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 12:46 +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 9/21/23 11:32, Levente Cs
On 9/21/23 11:32, Levente Csikor wrote:
> Thanks Ilya for the response.
>
> It turned out that the latest DPDK I can manually compile on the
> Bluefield-2 without errors is v20.08.
>
> After looking at the table you pointed me, my best option was
> OvS 2.14.9 with DPDK-v19.11.13.
>
> Compilation
Thanks Ilya for the response.
It turned out that the latest DPDK I can manually compile on the
Bluefield-2 without errors is v20.08.
After looking at the table you pointed me, my best option was
OvS 2.14.9 with DPDK-v19.11.13.
Compilations went well without error, now I have the same problem whe
On 9/20/23 06:39, Levente Csikor via discuss wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a long lasting problem I have been trying to resolve for quite
> some time. I am playing around with an NVidia SmartNIC (Bluefield-2),
> which has OvS installed by default. It works well with the kernel
> driver, and even TC
On 24 Aug 2023, at 9:50, xiao k via discuss wrote:
> hi,
> I tried run ovs-dpdk implement NAT connect tracking hardware offload,when i
> use "ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows -m" show the flow table,the status of
> offloaded field was "offloaded:partial",not full offloaded.Is there any way
> to
Hi,
Any update with this issue?
This issue happens with OVS 3.0.4 and DPDK 21.11.2 too.
Best regards
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailma
Hi,
Any update with this issue? This issue happens with OVS 3.0.1 and DPDK
21.11.3 too.
Best regards,
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:45:37 +0800 (CST)
> From: ?? <13813836...@163.com>
> To: b...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk crash
> Message-ID: <6cb12966.2f9.185dd96f9a5.coremai
Tobias Hofmann (tohofman) ,
> ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> *Cc: *i.maxim...@ovn.org
> *Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OvS DPDK takes too many hugepages
>
> On 2/15/23 22:46, Tobias Hofmann (tohofman) via discuss wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’
Thanks Ilya, I can confirm this solves my problem.
Regards
Tobias
From: Ilya Maximets
Date: Wednesday, 15. February 2023 at 14:56
To: Tobias Hofmann (tohofman) , ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Cc: i.maxim...@ovn.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OvS DPDK takes too many hugepages
On 2/15/23 22:46
On 2/15/23 22:46, Tobias Hofmann (tohofman) via discuss wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> I’m enabling DPDK on a system and I don’t see any errors while doing so.
> However, after enabling DPDK, I can see that my system has way less free
> hugepages than expected. It should only be using 512 a
Hi,
It seem that you can attach SR-IOV VF of NIC to the VM. You mau use
suitable PMD of NIV for that purpose.
Best regards.
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:51:51 +
> From: Rohan Bose
> To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK in Virtual Machine (KVM)
> Message-ID: <810
Hi,
it looks like I ran into the same bug
(https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2022-September/052065.html).
Did you find a solution for the problem?
Best regards
Michael
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.ope
Hi,ALL
After natted, hash values caculated from key and rev_key are different, natted
conn is for lookup
connection if packet come from reply dirction. natted conn is not add count of
connections.
memory doubled if natted
Hi, ALL
A assert panic was trigger when I run ovs-dpdk tests.
one v
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:06 AM Rahul Shah via discuss
wrote:
>
> I am testing the OVS-DPDK with KNI port type but have been getting the ‘Not
> supported’ error. I checked my OVS iface_types and KNI is not listed in the
> port type.
>
> I am using the latest OVS and DPDK 21.11. The DPDK is built
Thanks for your reply!
Can you share the commit that had disabled it in the later versions if you have
it handy?
Thanks
Thilak Raj S
From: Satish Patel
Sent: 06 November 2021 07:25
To: Thilak Raj Surendra Babu
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk and userspace
I believe I had same issue and patch is available in 2.16.x version of OVS. TSO
TX offload not supported in OVS.
I’m not expert so let someone else chime in.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 5, 2021, at 2:32 PM, Thilak Raj Surendra Babu
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Folks,
> I have a host with a DPDK
Thank you for reply kevin,
I do have a multi queue configuration, as you can see following. Let
me tell you what tools I am using for traffic generation. We run VoIP
services (pretty much telco style) so we need low latency for the
network to provide quality audio experience for customers. We
deve
On 30/10/2021 06:07, Satish Patel wrote:
Folks,
I have configured ovs-dpdk to replace sriov deployment for bonding
support. everything good but somehow as soon as i start hitting
200kpps rate i start seeing packet drop.
I have configured CPU isolation as per documentation to assign a
dedicated
amantopoulos; ovs-discuss
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk: can't set n_txq for dpdk interface
On 07/03/2021 03:57, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> It appears that setting the n_txq option has no effect for dpdk Interfaces,
> e.g.: "ovs-vsctl set Interface
Thanks for you reply.
This is my profile:
kernel: 3.10.0-1160.el7.x86_64
openvswitch: 2.12.0
dpdk: 18.11.8
NIC: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GbE SFP+ (rev 02)
driver: i40e
firmware-version: 1.67, 0x8fa8, 19.5.12
I’ll try new version.
How dpdk config change when server enab
Hi,
What specific versions of OvS,DPDK, Kernel and i40e driver are you using?
Have you tried moving to a new release? I tried with OvS 2.13.1 and DPDK
19.11.2 and saw no error
when I created bond port listed below.
Thanks,
Emma Finn
From: discuss On Behalf Of KhacThuan Bk
Sent: Tuesday 9 March
On 07/03/2021 03:57, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> It appears that setting the n_txq option has no effect for dpdk Interfaces,
> e.g.: "ovs-vsctl set Interface dpdk-eno1 options:n_txq=2".
>
> n_txq appears to be hardcoded to "5" for my driver (BNX2X PMD), for some
> reason.
>
It
Hello again,
To better show the effects of the issue described in my original message,
here's a pastebin link with some information following a clean installation
of debian testing: https://pastebin.com/d8vpvRZr
As you can see, ovs-vsctl does set the n_txq=6 option, but appctl doesn't
register th
On 11/26/2019 7:41 AM, Rami Neiman wrote:
Hello,
I am using OVS DPDK 2.9.2 with TRex traffic generator to simply
forward the received traffic back to the traffic generator (i.e.
ingress0->egeress0, egress0->ingress0) over 2 port 10G NIC.
The OVS throughput with this setup matches the traff
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:45:13 +
"Tobias Hofmann \(tohofman\) via discuss"
wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> to follow up on this: I have just upgraded DPDK to 18.11 and OVS to
> 2.11 and I don't see this issue anymore. Also, I don't observe any
> "ring error" messages although the MTU is still at 9216
Hi Flavio,
to follow up on this: I have just upgraded DPDK to 18.11 and OVS to 2.11 and I
don't see this issue anymore. Also, I don't observe any "ring error" messages
although the MTU is still at 9216 and OvS only has 1Gb of memory.
Do you have an idea which change in DPDK/OvS might have resolv
Hi Flavio,
the only error I saw in 'ovs-vsctl show' was related to the dpdk port. The
other ports all came up fine.
Regarding the "ring error", I'm fine with having it, as long as DPDK is able to
reserve the minimum amount of memory (which, after restarting OvS process is
always the case).
Re
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:47:09 +
"Tobias Hofmann \(tohofman\) via discuss"
wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> thanks for the insights! Unfortunately, I don't know about the pdump
> and its relation to the ring.
pdump dumps packets from dpdk ports into rings/mempools, so that you
can inspect/use the traff
Hi Flavio,
thanks for the insights! Unfortunately, I don't know about the pdump and its
relation to the ring.
Can you please specify where I can see that the port is not ready yet? Is that
these three lines:
2019-11-02T14:14:23.094Z|00070|dpdk|ERR|EAL: Cannot find unplugged device
(:08:0b
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 19:12:36 +
"Tobias Hofmann (tohofman)" wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> thanks for reaching out.
>
> The DPDK options used in OvS are:
>
> other_config:pmd-cpu-mask=0x202
> other_config:dpdk-socket-mem=1024
> other_config:dpdk-init=true
>
>
> For the dpdk port, we set:
>
> typ
Hi Flavio,
thanks for reaching out.
The DPDK options used in OvS are:
other_config:pmd-cpu-mask=0x202
other_config:dpdk-socket-mem=1024
other_config:dpdk-init=true
For the dpdk port, we set:
type=dpdk
options:dpdk-devargs=:08:0b.2
external_ids:unused-drv=i40evf
mtu_request=9216
Please
It would be nice if you share the DPDK options used in OvS.
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 15:43:18 +
"Tobias Hofmann \(tohofman\) via discuss"
wrote:
> Hello community,
>
> My team and I observe a strange behavior on our system with the
> creation of dpdk ports in OVS. We have a CentOS 7 system with
Thanks Ben and Alon for your help.
I want to share the solution in case someone else hits the same issue:
dpdkvhostuser type requires the bridge to be created with
datatype_path=netdev as stated in the documentation:
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/dpdk/
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
El j
I forgot to finish my thought.
For the most recent version of OVS, if DPDK is supported, so is
dpdkvhostuser (and dpdkvhostuserclient, which is not deprecated). Maybe
dpdkvhostuser was optional in 2.9.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:22:20PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It looks like dpdkvhostuser ports
It looks like dpdkvhostuser ports are deprecated, although they should
still work.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:35:53AM -0300, Nicolas Vazquez wrote:
> My mistake :)
>
> Been checking the /var/run/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log and found this is
> the error:
>
> 2019-07-11T03:11:31.789Z|00226|netdev
My mistake :)
Been checking the /var/run/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log and found this is
the error:
2019-07-11T03:11:31.789Z|00226|netdev_dpdk|INFO|Socket
/var/run/openvswitch/test created for vhost-user port test
2019-07-11T03:11:31.790Z|00227|dpif_netlink|WARN|system@ovs-system: cannot
create po
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 04:16:14PM -0300, Nicolas Vazquez wrote:
> Thank you both.
>
> I tried replacing the OVS packages. Have bind NIC to DPDK support:
> # dpdk-devbind --status
>
> Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver
>
> :02:04.0 '82545
Thank you both.
I tried replacing the OVS packages. Have bind NIC to DPDK support:
# dpdk-devbind --status
Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver
:02:04.0 '82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) 100f'
drv=igb_uio unused=
However whenev
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:30:12AM -0300, Nicolas Vazquez wrote:
> I've been trying to extend an existing OVS installation on CentOS 7 to
> support DPDK, but could not find a way without a clean install. Is it
> possible to configure OVS with DPDK without reinstalling it? [1]
>
> # ovs-vsctl --no-
I dont think is dpdk enabled package...
you need to get the ovs from the openstack repo...
From: Nicolas Vazquez
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 5:05 PM
To: Alon Dotan
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK on CentOS 7
Version is 2.9.2
Version is 2.9.2 and package is 'openvswitch-2.9.2-1.el7' from CentOS repo
El mié., 10 jul. 2019 a las 10:54, Alon Dotan ()
escribió:
> which version of ovs you are using?
> from which repo? there is issue with EL7 packaging and ovs dpdk
> --
> *From:* ovs-discuss-boun
which version of ovs you are using?
from which repo? there is issue with EL7 packaging and ovs dpdk
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org
on behalf of Nicolas Vazquez
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 4:30 PM
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss
So is there any way to have TSO work with OVS-DPDK? Are there any patches
which can be applied? Because I followed this Intel page and the author was
able to get the 2.5x higher throughput for OVS-DPDK as compared to native
OVS.
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/set-up-open-vswitch-with-dpd
I think the reason of lower throughput in the scenario of OVS-DPDK is that
TSO(GSO)& GRO are not supported in OVS-DPDK. So the packets between the VMs
are limited to the MTU of the vhostuser ports.
And the kernel based OVS supports TSO(GSO)&GRO, the TCP packets can be up to
64KB, so the
> -Original Message-
> From: Tobias Hofmann -T (tohofman - AAP3 INC at Cisco)
> [mailto:tohof...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 9:39 PM
> To: b...@openvswitch.org; Burakov, Anatoly
> Cc: Shriroop Joshi (shrirjos) ; Stokes, Ian
>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discu
Hi Anatoly,
I just wanted to follow up on the issue reported below. (It's already been 2
weeks ago)
I don’t really understand the first solution you suggested: use IOVA as VA mode
Does that mean I shall load vfio-pci driver before I set dpdk-init to true? So,
doing a 'modprobe vfio-pci'? Actual
On 3/20/2019 10:37 PM, Tobias Hofmann -T (tohofman - AAP3 INC at Cisco)
via discuss wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I wasnt sure at first glance what was happening so discussed with
Anatoly (Cc'd) who has worked a considerable amount with DPDK memory
models. Please see response below to what the suspecte
But DPDK builds successfully by itself. Any suggestions where the build
is breaking down?
I sent a patch for this problem
(https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1013466/).
Can you try (and maybe ack) it?
Confirm, the patch fixes the problem. Thanks.
Dave
_
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:53:55 -0800
David Christensen wrote:
> Attempting to use DPDK 18.11 with Monday's OVS commit that supports DPDK
> 18.11 (commit 03f3f9c0faf838a8506c3b5ce6199af401d13cb3). When building
> OVS with DPDK support I'm receiving a build error related to libmnl not
> being fou
> But DPDK builds successfully by itself. Any suggestions where the build is
> breaking down?
What do you mean?
The question whether Mellanox PMD is compiled. If it is compiled than libnl
is needed
Thanks,
Olga
-Original Message-
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org
[mailto
On 29/11/2018 08:24, LIU Yulong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently tested ovs-dpdk, but we met some bandwidth issue. The bandwidth
> from VM to VM was not close to the physical NIC, it's about 4.3Gbps on a
> 10Gbps NIC. For no dpdk (virtio-net) VMs, the iperf3 test can easily
> reach 9.3Gbps. We enabled
Hi,
I managed to solve this performance issue. I got improved performance after
turning off the mrg_rxbuf and increasing the rx and tx queue sizes to 1024.
Thanks,
Onkar
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:57 PM Onkar Pednekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We figured out that the packet processing appliance within VM
Hi,
We figured out that the packet processing appliance within VM (which reads
from raw socket on the dpdk vhost user interface) requires more packets per
second to give higher throughput. Else its cpu utilization is idle most of
the times.
We increased the "tx-flush-interval" from default 0 to 5
On 10/25/2018 3:10 AM, pratik maru wrote:
Hello,
I have a compute node installed with OVS+DPDK, and I am running a WRL
Guest VM which also has DPDK app running inside it.
This Guest VM has two interfaces - 1 VirtIO (mgmt) + 1 SRIOV (used by
DPDK app). I am observing that as soon as my DPDK a
Hi Tiago,
Sure. I'll try that.
Thanks,
Onkar
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:06 AM Lam, Tiago wrote:
> Hi Onkar,
>
> Thanks for shedding some light.
>
> I don't think your difference in performance will have to do your
> OvS-DPDK setup. If you're taking the measurements directly from the
> iperf serv
Hi Onkar,
Thanks for shedding some light.
I don't think your difference in performance will have to do your
OvS-DPDK setup. If you're taking the measurements directly from the
iperf server side you'd be going through the "Internet". Assuming you
don't have a dedicated connection there, things lik
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your reply. Below are the answers to your questions inline.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:01 AM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Onkar Pednekar wrote:
> > I have been experimenting with OVS DPDK on 1G interfaces. The system
> > has 8 cores (hyperthreading enabled) mix of
Hi Tiago,
Thanks for your reply.
Below are the answers to your questions in-line.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 4:07 AM Lam, Tiago wrote:
> Hi Onkar,
>
> Thanks for your email. Your setup isn't very clear to me, so a few
> queries in-line.
>
> On 04/10/2018 06:06, Onkar Pednekar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
Onkar Pednekar wrote:
> I have been experimenting with OVS DPDK on 1G interfaces. The system
> has 8 cores (hyperthreading enabled) mix of dpdk and non-dpdk capable
> ports, but the data traffic runs only on dpdk ports.
> DPDK ports are backed by vhost user netdev and I have conf
Hi Onkar,
Thanks for your email. Your setup isn't very clear to me, so a few
queries in-line.
On 04/10/2018 06:06, Onkar Pednekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been experimenting with OVS DPDK on 1G interfaces. The system has
> 8 cores (hyperthreading enabled) mix of dpdk and non-dpdk capable ports,
>
On 9/12/2018 7:02 AM, multi_task wrote:
Hi,
What is the current state about the ovs-dpdk TSO offload feature? Is
this planned any time soon?
There is ongoing work to enable TSO for OVS with DPDK.
There are patches available that are under review currently but have not
been upstreamed to m
-memtoo small ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> O Mahony, Billy 于2018年8月21日周二 下午4:17写道：
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> One thing to look out for with DPDK < 18.05 is that you need to used 1GB
>> huge pages (and no more than eight of them) to use virtio. I’m not sure
mber it causing a seg
> fault. But is certainly worth checking.
>
>
>
> If that does not work please send the info Ciara refers to as well as the
> ovs-vsctl interface config for the ovs vhost backend.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Billy
>
>
>
> *From:* ovs-disc
com; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Cc: us...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk crash when use vhost-user in docker
Hi,
I am cc-ing the DPDK users’ list as the SEGV originates in the DPDK vHost code
and somebody there might be able to help too.
Could you provide more information about y
Hi,
I am cc-ing the DPDK users’ list as the SEGV originates in the DPDK vHost code
and somebody there might be able to help too.
Could you provide more information about your environment please? eg. OVS &
DPDK versions, hugepage configuration, etc.
Thanks,
Ciara
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openv
Flavio,
Thanks. That's what I suspected. I guess if too many packets that are
meant to be managed by DPDK get exposed to the kernel space via a TAP
interface then the speed gains would be lost.
I've also found that solutions to manage Layer 3 for DPDK devices are not
part of OVS. Either OVN o
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 05:18:08PM -0400, Pedro Serrano wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> My computer is setup using Ubuntu 18.04 with OVS 2.90 and dpdk 17.11.2-1.
> I'm attempting to create a few virtual ports (type dkdkvhostuserclient) on
> my OVS bridge (datapath_type=netdev) and assign an IP addresses
Pradeep
I have tried few tests by trying to turn on TSO , but according to my
observation, ovs-dpdk doesn't support TSO Offloading.
You can try this reference from the following page:
http://dpdk-test-plans.readthedocs.io/en/latest/vhost_tso_test_plan.html
Thanks
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:39 A
:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Stokes, Ian
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 19, 2018 9:51 PM
> *To:* michael me <1michaelmesgu...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org; Mooney, Sean K >
> *Subject:* RE: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
>
>
>
> Hi Michael,
&
From: Stokes, Ian
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 9:51 PM
To: michael me <1michaelmesgu...@gmail.com>
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org; Mooney, Sean K
Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
Hi Michael,
“It will be split between queues based on des tip so it’s importan
scuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
Hi Ian,
Thank you for you answers!
it is correct that i am using ovs-vsctl set Interface dpdk0 options:n_rxq=8
commands for the queues.
Could you please expand on the sentence " It will be split between queues
based
y even if some of the configuration
> commands may have changed
>
>
>
> https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/configure-vhost-
> user-multiqueue-for-ovs-with-dpdk
>
>
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> *From:* michael me [mailto:1michaelmesgu...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednes
me [mailto:1michaelmesgu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:23 PM
To: Stokes, Ian
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
Hi Ian,
In the deployment i do have vhost user; below is the full output of the
ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/pmd
Hi Ian,
In the deployment i do have vhost user; below is the full output of
the ovs-appctl
dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show command.
root@W:/# ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show
pmd thread numa_id 0 core_id 1:
isolated : false
port: dpdk1 queue-id: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
port: dpdk
Hi Michael,
Are you using dpdk vhostuser ports in this deployment?
I would expect to see them listed in the output of ovs-appctl
dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show you posted below.
Can you describe the expected traffic flow ( Is it North/South using DPDK phy
devices as well as vhost devices or east/wes
Olga
i'm familiar with the procedure. I can build dpdk 17.11 but has this
compilation error in 17.08
Here https://community.mellanox.com/thread/3545 the answer to the same error
is to install another OFED - when I install this OFED, it breaks the build of
17.11 and 17.08
Best Regards
Avi
> -
Please refer to mlx5 DPDK guide:
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides-17.11/nics/mlx5.html
-Original Message-
From: Avi Cohen (A) [mailto:avi.co...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 3:51 PM
To: Olga Shern ; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: RE: ovs-dpdk cannot add a dpdk mellanox por
Olga
Now I have compilation error
/home/avi/dpdk-17.08/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h:46:32: fatal error:
infiniband/mlx5_hw.h: No such file or directory
> -Original Message-
> From: Avi Cohen (A)
> Sent: Monday, 19 February, 2018 3:41 PM
> To: 'Olga Shern'; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Su
Ohh. - I've downgrade to 17.08 (from 17.11) and forgot to set this flag .
checking now...
> -Original Message-
> From: Olga Shern [mailto:ol...@mellanox.com]
> Sent: Monday, 19 February, 2018 3:26 PM
> To: Avi Cohen (A); ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Subject: RE: ovs-dpdk cannot add a dp
Did you compile DPDK with mlx5 PMD enabled?
-Original Message-
From: Avi Cohen (A) [mailto:avi.co...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 3:20 PM
To: Olga Shern ; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: RE: ovs-dpdk cannot add a dpdk mellanox port
Thank you Olga
I did specify the po
Thank you Olga
I did specify the port name as ibv_devinfo output - but still I'm getting error
msg:
Feb 19 15:16:03 Pizza05 ovs-vsctl: ovs|1|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl
--timeout 10 add-port br-phy dpdk0 -- set Interface dpdk0 type=dpdk
options:dpdk-devargs=mlx5_0
Feb 19 15:16:03 Pizza0
Hi Avi,
Please try the following commandovs-vsctl --timeout 10 add-port br-phy
dpdk0 -- set Interface dpdk0 type=dpdk options:dpdk-devargs=mlx5_0
You need to specify port name, mlx5_0 or mlx5_1 according ibv_devinfo output
Starting DPDK 18.02 and 17.11.2 you will be able to use PCI ad
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:06:08 +0800
徐荣杰 wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I do have the memAccess property as follows for both VM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>memAccess='shared'/>
>
>
OK, then look if the socket path is correct.
Also if you don't hav
> To: Xu, Rongjie (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
> Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dpdk] how to link between guest vNIC and
> dpdkvhost socket
>
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:36:13 +
> "Xu, Rongjie (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" wrote:
>
> > Hi
, 2017 09:50
To: Xu, Rongjie (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dpdk] how to link between guest vNIC and
dpdkvhost socket
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:36:13 +
"Xu, Rongjie (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have one OpenSta
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:36:13 +
"Xu, Rongjie (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have one OpenStack environment with OVS-DPDK (manually installed). I
> success to launch two VMs on two separate compute node with vhostuser
> interface type. But I cannot ping from one to another. I found
Hi Lance,
Your patch works. Thanks.
BR,
Wang Zhike
-Original Message-
From: Lance Richardson [mailto:lrich...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 8:10 PM
To: 王志克
Cc: ovs-...@openvswitch.org; ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK QoS rate limit issue
> From: "王志克"
> To: ovs-...@openvswitch.org, ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 11:41:05 PM
> Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK QoS rate limit issue
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am using OVS2.7.0 and DPDK 16.11, and testing rate limit function.
>
>
>
> I found that
Anyone who can help me with this, or can point to a more relevant forum.
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org
[mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Arslan, Alp - Dell
Team
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 8:16 PM
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPD
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM
>
> *To: *Darrell Ball
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
From: Hui Xiang
Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM
To: Darrell Ball
Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Darrell Ball
mailto:db...@vmware.com>> wrote:
From: Hui Xia
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM
> *To: *Darrell Ball
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
>
From: Hui Xiang
Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM
To: Darrell Ball
Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Darrell Ball
mailto:db...@vmware.com>> wrote:
From: Hui Xia
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 3:18 AM
> *To: *Darrell Ball
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
>
From: Hui Xiang
Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 3:18 AM
To: Darrell Ball
Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
Blow is the diagram (using OVS-DPDK):
1. For packets coming to vm1 from internet where could have MTU 1500, th
well.
[image: Inline image 1]
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM
> *To: *Darrell Ball
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DP
From: Hui Xiang
Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM
To: Darrell Ball
Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
Thanks Darrell, comment inline.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Darrell Ball
mailto:db...@vmware.com>&g
Thanks Darrell, comment inline.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Hui Xiang <
> xiangh...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:47 PM
> *To: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *[ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation requi
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
