more expensive test which shows my true blood group. It made me wonder how many women that are really Rh pos are being treated unnecessarily.>From: "Lindsay Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au>To:
>Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D>
Lindsay Kennedy
Sent: Tuesday, 2 August 2005 5:30 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
Further to the discussion about anti-D, I was in clinics today and the
subject came up. Woman was Rh - and partner was also Rh -. Dr was happy
for her to skip anti-D
] On Behalf Of G Lemay
Sent: Friday, 29 July 2005 4:01 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
Yes, mistakes can be made by hosp labs on the blood typing of the
newborn. Happened to me. Two neg parents, first child neg. Normally I
wouldn't have even checke
In my original post I was making a suggestion based on
natural selection not knowing that the neg gene is always recessive (yes I also
did some research). Because the negative gene IS RECESSIVE two negative
parents have only negative genes to pass on and therefore cannot have a positive
ess 2 x Rh neg genes - one from each parent. If somone
is Rh pos it is possible for them to carry either a positive or
negative recessive gene. I hope that makes sense?
Leanne.
From: "Fiona Rumble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To:
Subject: Re: [ozmi
Hi, one possibility is that the lab could have made a mistake or there was a
mix-up with specimens? MM
There is no possibility 2 RH- parents can have an RH+ baby. The positive
gene is dominant, therefore:
If a person has the genes + +, the Rh factor in the blood will be positive.
If a person ha
Mmm...
- Original Message -
From: "Kirsten Dobbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 1:58 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
There is no possibility 2 RH- parents can have an RH+ baby. The positive
gene is dominant
12:16 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
At the risk of sounding stupid, I remember a couple who were both Rh-ve and
yet their baby was Rh+ve.
Now was this a case of 'Father unknown' or a mistake, or is it possible for
this to happen?
Both partne
Perhaps possible with a recessive gene ?
Autosomal dominant or not etc..
- Original Message -
From: "Susan Cudlipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
At the risk of sounding stupid, I remem
pp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
At the risk of sounding stupid, I remember a couple who were both Rh-ve
and yet their baby was Rh+ve.
Now was this a case of 'Father unknown' or a mistake, or is it pos
: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:45
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh
anti-D
At the risk of sounding stupid, I remember a couple who were
both Rh-ve and yet their baby was Rh+ve.Now was this a case of 'Father
unknown' or a mistake, or is it possible for this to happen?Both
partn
of evil is for good men to do
nothing"
Edmund Burke
- Original Message -
From: "Naomi Wilkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
I had this experience! I am Rh neg and so is my hubby. I was told I
Absolutely
Alesa
- Original Message -
From:
brendamanning
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 7:14
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh
anti-D
The not testing partners
thing is probably all to do with litigation, blah, blah
blah
1
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh
anti-D
I agree with you, Brenda, my point is that we aren't allowed
to test the partners even if they want it.
Sally
---Original
dsor
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:57
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] RH - Anti
D
Having done a bit of research on it recently for our birth centre women
it seems that only 1.5% of negative women will become isoimmunized during
pregnancy. And t
I agree with you, Brenda, my point is that we aren't allowed to test the partners even if they want it.
Sally
---Original Message---
From: brendamanning
Date: 07/26/05 18:19:26
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
Sally,
If wom
I had this experience! I am Rh neg and so is my hubby. I was told I would
still need to have anti-D during pregnancy. Although the doctor never
stated that my husband may not have been the father of my child, that's
what was implied. I refused and thankfully was saved from any further
haras
om:
sally
williams
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:56
PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
Funnily enough, we are not allowed to test the pa
Funnily enough, we are not allowed to test the partners of Rh neg women to see if they are negative too, thus ruling out the necessity for giving Anti-D, because apparently we can't trust women to be truthful about the father of their baby!!
Sally
---Original Message--
Having done a bit of research on it recently for our birth centre women it seems that only 1.5% of negative women will become isoimmunized during pregnancy. And that figure includes a large proportion who are mismanaged and not given Anti-D when potential sensitizing events occur eg. bleeding, ect
20 matches
Mail list logo
