https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877742
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878249
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-polyval
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878574
Bug ID: 1878574
Summary: Review Request: emacs-async - Asynchronous processing
in Emacs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862842
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/icon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876911
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sortedcollections
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878279
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/antimicrox
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878514
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862842
--- Comment #5 from Eric Smith ---
Thanks for reviewing! I don't think the icon binary itself needs the icall.h
header. I believe it is provided for the purpose of building add-on modules, so
conceptually I think it would belong in a -devel su
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878529
Boian Bonev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878529
Bug ID: 1878529
Summary: Review Request: iotop-c - Simple top-like I/O monitor
(implemented in C)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877702
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d2c3726a7f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ba4ff0908c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878350
--- Comment #2 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1)
Thanks for the review!
Updated files:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/alebastr/sway-extras/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01659102-gammastep/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878514
--- Comment #2 from Kees de Jong ---
Strange... My mock build works fine:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51376359
However, when I do `fedora-review -b 1878514` to review the package, it fails
with:
Executing(%install):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878514
Kees de Jong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878514
Bug ID: 1878514
Summary: Review Request: catimg - Print images in a terminal
with 256 colors support
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Lin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-021483c324 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871825
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-c9941d5bd1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867329
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f2c2d6ad2a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871825
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821189
Bug 1821189 depends on bug 1871825, which changed state.
Bug 1871825 Summary: Review Request: python-ratelimiter - Python module
providing rate limiting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871825
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877873
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-8a63eb6948 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877811
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877811
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878134
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878134
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Andy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878488
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1876823
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878488
Bug ID: 1878488
Summary: Review Request: perl-String-TtyLength - Length or
width of string excluding ANSI tty codes
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ba4ff0908c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ba4ff0908c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-021483c324 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-021483c324
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878350
--- Comment #1 from Andy Mender ---
> %files indicator
> %{_bindir}/%{name}-indicator
> %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}-indicator.desktop
> %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/%{name}-status-*.svg
> %{_metainfodir}/%{name}-indicator.appda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877873
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-8a63eb6948 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8a63eb6948
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878350
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876911
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876911
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Andy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877886
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876911
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #3)
> Since the tests were added to %check, now one needs an explicit
> BuildRequires on python-sortedcontainers, otherwise the build fails.
>
> The below line is n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876911
--- Comment #3 from Andy Mender ---
Since the tests were added to %check, now one needs an explicit BuildRequires
on python-sortedcontainers, otherwise the build fails.
Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51353681
COPR:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860688
--- Comment #7 from Andy Mender ---
> I haven't requested the package be un-retired yet as I don't have a sponsor.
> My intention was to request un-retirement once I knew I could get the new
> package into the repos.
Right, I forgot about t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862842
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878234
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
46 matches
Mail list logo