https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #26 from Fabien Boucher ---
New package review request is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #25 from Fabien Boucher ---
Sure I'll go over that process for zuul package too.
So updating resources for deps:
python-APScheduler: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813957
python-fb-re2 (approved): https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #24 from Fabio Valentini ---
Note that the PR for zuul also won't work, since the package was retired.
You'll need to go through the same unretirement process as for the two retired
dependencies.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #23 from Miro Hrončok ---
> Also want to restore orphan/dead packages (not sure about the process btw)
If just orphaned, click **take**
If retired for no more than 8 weeks, request unretirement via releng ticket
If retired for 8+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #22 from Fabien Boucher ---
Hi,
I'm in the process to restore this effort. 4 deps are missing from Fedora
Rawhide:
New package requests (spec there + scratch build):
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812857 python-ws
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #21 from Tristan Cacqueray ---
The software factory project still maintains a zuul.spec for CentOS here:
https://softwarefactory-project.io/cgit/scl/zuul-distgit/ .
I think most of the requirements are already present in Fedora, ho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
josef radinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||che...@nosuchhost.net
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #19 from Tristan Cacqueray ---
With the next 3.0.0 version approaching release, it seems like we should drop
that spec and start with the new version directly. To that effect, I ported the
zuulv3 package from software-factory to fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/zuul
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #15 from Paul Belanger ---
Haïkel: Updates per comments.
https://pabelanger.fedorapeople.org/zuul/zuul.spec
https://pabelanger.fedorapeople.org/zuul/zuul-2.1.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #14 from Paul Belanger ---
@Fabien, ya I planned to resync once we created a git remove on
fedoraproject.org. Will make things a little easier to collaborate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #13 from Fabien Boucher ---
Hi,
I suggest to re-consider the packaging by looking at the
work that have been done by Tristan there:
https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/gitweb?p=software-factory/zuul-distgit.git;a=blob;f=zuul.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #12 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Few points:
* please use %license
* please use %{python2_sitelib}
* please fix Source0 URL, this one is not working anymore s/python.org/io/
should do the trick
* Group tag is not needed anymore
* does no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #10 from Paul Belanger ---
So, I've made a few changes to the spec that Fabien has started. Specifically,
I removed a few things because they are currently in flux upstream (am a zuul
developer).
I've also removed the systemd file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: The review request does not
have fedora-review+, and does not seem fully reviewed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
Paul Belanger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
social's scratch build of
openstack-puppet-modules?#db4e135626252ebf0b23b8a0e6e98ce0dcf2f9e6 for
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/openstack-puppet-modules?#db4e135626252ebf0b23b8a0e6e98ce0dcf2f9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #6 from Fabien Boucher ---
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the review. I've submitted the patch upstream and added a comment in
the spec file. For systemd service files I'll try.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer ---
A few notes:
- The service file could be sent upstream, since systemd is the same on every
supported platform ( so it avoid work duplication with debian, suse, etc )
- ideally, I like when the patch ha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Blocks|1778
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #3 from Fabien Boucher ---
Hello,
The packaging for Zuul has been updated since a tagged version is available
upstream. I have tested and validated the package manually by first installing
python-APScheduler (currently waiting for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
--- Comment #2 from Fabien Boucher ---
Hi Tristan,
Thanks you for the review. You are right python-setuptools was missing so I
added it in BuildRequires. Also I removed all tabulations so fedora-review no
longer reports that problem. I fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
Tristan Cacqueray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdeca...@redhat.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
Fabien Boucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
28 matches
Mail list logo