Hi guys,
Apologies if this has been discussed before but as a new mailling list
user I have not seen anything.
We have been running recursor as a caching name server for a number of
months having moved from unbound, since this time we see good, in fact
quick DNS response time but then when
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:43:19AM +, Simon Bedford wrote:
We have been running recursor as a caching name server for a number
of months having moved from unbound, since this time we see good, in
fact quick DNS response time but then when running 3.1.7.1 and .2
and also 3.2.1 we see
bert hubert wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:43:19AM +, Simon Bedford wrote:
We have been running recursor as a caching name server for a number
of months having moved from unbound, since this time we see good, in
fact quick DNS response time but then when running 3.1.7.1 and .2
and also
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:16:40AM +, Simon Bedford wrote:
Mar 17 11:57:02 [5] bbc.co.uk.: Resolved 'bbc.co.uk.' NS ns1.bbc.co.uk. to:
132.185.132.21
Mar 17 11:57:02 [5] bbc.co.uk.: Trying IP 132.185.132.21:53, asking
'bbc.co.uk.|A'
Mar 17 11:57:04 [5] bbc.co.uk.: timeout resolving
On 17.03.2010, at 12:37, Simon Bedford wrote:
This is what is causing the mystery for me, when its good its really good but
then response times go crazy at a random time, its dropped our customer
experience graphing from 99.987% to 89% (some of this will be the 3.1.7.2
cache maintenance
Hi all,
I've just tested the PowerDNS Recursor 3.2 with its out of the box
configuration against the tests outlined at
https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/replysizetest
It seems that EDNS is disabled by default, which is confirmed by the
comment attached to changeset #1430
