Re: [Pdns-users] [Recursor] Resolving large RRsets

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:35:47AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:30:18AM +0100, > bert hubert wrote > a message of 286 lines which said: > > > Dec 13 09:23:54 [1] all-wikileaks.bortzmeyer.fr.: truncated bit set, > > retrying via TCP > > This is not perfect:

Re: [Pdns-users] [Recursor] Resolving large RRsets

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:30:18AM +0100, bert hubert wrote a message of 286 lines which said: > Dec 13 09:23:54 [1] all-wikileaks.bortzmeyer.fr.: truncated bit set, > retrying via TCP This is not perfect: with BIND and Unbound, there is no fallback to TCP since they use EDNS0 (with a defau

Re: [Pdns-users] [Recursor] Resolving large RRsets

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:07:10AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I do not have access to a PowerDNS Recursor and I would be glad if > people could test and see if they can resolve the RRset > all-wikileaks.bortzmeyer.fr (2200 bytes) as explained here: Hi Stephane! Appears to work. Here is

[Pdns-users] [Recursor] Resolving large RRsets

I do not have access to a PowerDNS Recursor and I would be glad if people could test and see if they can resolve the RRset all-wikileaks.bortzmeyer.fr (2200 bytes) as explained here: http://www.bortzmeyer.org/size-dns-wikileaks.html ___ Pdns-users mailin