Re: [Pdns-users] Any status on DNSSEC in Recursor?

2015-02-23 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello Charles, On 20 Feb 2015, at 20:08 , Charles Sprickman sp...@bway.net wrote: Sounds good. I’m itching to tell our users they’re a bit “safer”, and I have about zero interest in learning a third DNS server (unbound). The old blog post noted that you’d be leveraging another server for

Re: [Pdns-users] About the mechanism of forward-zones when using multiple ips for one zonename.

2015-02-23 Thread Hongyi Zhao
Why not let the process run parallely and then picked out the one which is retured firstly to the client? Regards 2015-02-23 18:28 GMT+08:00 Peter van Dijk peter.van.d...@powerdns.com: Hello, On 23 Feb 2015, at 6:09 , Hongyi Zhao hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote: forward-zones Comma separated

Re: [Pdns-users] About the mechanism of forward-zones when using multiple ips for one zonename.

2015-02-23 Thread Hongyi Zhao
Considering that the backend/forwarder IPs are always NOT owned by the authoritive servers of the queryer. It wil be difficult to ensure all of them online all the time. So, if we can let the process run parallely and then picked out the one which is retured firstly to the client. At least the

Re: [Pdns-users] About the mechanism of forward-zones when using multiple ips for one zonename.

2015-02-23 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello, On 23 Feb 2015, at 11:49 , Hongyi Zhao hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote: Why not let the process run parallely and then picked out the one which is retured firstly to the client? In general (without forward-rules), we do something better - we try the servers and remember which one was

Re: [Pdns-users] About the mechanism of forward-zones when using multiple ips for one zonename.

2015-02-23 Thread Hongyi Zhao
Which forward-rules do you meant to by saying without forward-rules? Are these forward rules can all be setted or controlled by using config file fo pdns_recurrsor? Why these rules cann't be treated combinedly into the inner optimizing algrithems for determining the maybe-best servers? Regards

[Pdns-users] PowerDNS development plans: 4.x DNSSEC, C++ 2011!

2015-02-23 Thread bert hubert
In this post, we’d like to share our current plans for .. PowerDNS 4.x! We shared this first with the PowerDNS-development community, and after we gathered feedback, we’re now announcing it more broadly. The tl;dr: For the next few months we will be spring cleaning git master, and stable code

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS development plans: 4.x DNSSEC, C++ 2011!

2015-02-23 Thread Nicholas Williams
This is exciting news, Bert! Some follow-up questions/comments: - Will 3.x development end on the 3.4 track, or is there still a plan for 3.5? If 3.4 is it, what's the plan for features (such as ALIAS) that were scheduled for 3.5? Are they delayed to 4.0 (if so, sad face)? - Currently, PowerDNS

Re: [Pdns-users] About the mechanism of forward-zones when using multiple ips for one zonename.

2015-02-23 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello, On 23 Feb 2015, at 6:09 , Hongyi Zhao hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote: forward-zones Comma separated list of ’zonename=IP’ pairs. Queries for zones listed here will be forwarded to the IP address listed. Since version 3.1.5, multiple IP addresses can be specified. Additionally, port

Re: [Pdns-users] Multiple Entries in the Content field of NAPTR records.

2015-02-23 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello Jonathan, On 20 Feb 2015, at 18:28 , Jonathan Hunter hunter...@hotmail.com wrote: Is it possible when implementing NAPTR records in the records table to add multiple entries within the content field of a record? Im just trying to reduce the number of entries in the database, so

[Pdns-users] DNS names and strings (was: PowerDNS development plans: 4.x DNSSEC, C++ 2011!)

2015-02-23 Thread Michael Ströder
bert hubert wrote: In this post, we’d like to share our current plans for .. PowerDNS 4.x! Glad to read all your plans. * We treat DNS names as ASCII strings, which we escape and unescape repeatedly. DNS names are not ascii strings, and we keep finding issues related to us

Re: [Pdns-users] Reply-To Change?

2015-02-23 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:48:49PM -0600, Nicholas Williams wrote: This frequently trips me up a lot, and I end up replying directly to people and not sending to the list. I don't see any good reason for not having a list reply-to. Also, IIRC, the list software PowerDNS is using supports

Re: [Pdns-users] DNS names and strings (was: PowerDNS development plans: 4.x DNSSEC, C++ 2011!)

2015-02-23 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:44:54PM -0600, Nicholas Williams wrote: I'm also very interested in finding out more about the change around ASCII names. I can recommend our ever growing set of test cases: https://github.com/ahupowerdns/pdns/blob/dnsname/pdns/test-dnsname_cc.cc DNS, surprisingly,