On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 03:41:02PM +0200, rob777 via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to install pdns authoritative server on the newly released Ubuntu
> 24.04 LTS
>
> $ apt-get update
> ...
> Fehl:5 http://repo.powerdns.com/ubuntu noble-auth-49 Release
> 404 Not Found [IP: 188.166.116.224 8
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 11:02:27AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 03:41:02PM +0200, rob777 via Pdns-users wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I want to install pdns authoritative server on the newly released Ubuntu
> > 24.04
Hello!
Today we have released PowerDNS Recursor 4.8.9, 4.9.6 and 5.0.5.
These releases are maintenance releases that fix a few bugs. The most
important ones are:
* Two cases of counting towards limits related to DNSSEC validation
have been fixed.
* When using YAML se
Hello!
We are proud to announce the first alpha release of PowerDNS Recursor
5.1.0!
Compared to the latest 5.0 release, this release adds the possibility
to include settings previously set in the Lua configuration file in the
YAML configuration format that was introduced in the
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 11:23:59AM +, Kilian Ries via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> i think you may have all heared about DNSBomb attacks:
>
>
> https://www.isc.org/blogs/2024-dnsbomb/
>
>
> Are there any recommended settings for auth or dnsdist for mitigation such
> attacks?
>
>
> Th
Today we have released PowerDNS Recursor 5.0.6.
This release is a maintenance release. The most important change is
that the Recursor will warn if the Linux parameter vm.max_map_count[1]
is set too low to accommodate the maximum number of memory mappings
used and reduce the maximum
We are proud to announce the first beta release of PowerDNS Recursor
5.1.0!
Compared to the latest 5.0 release, this release adds the possibility
to include settings previously set in the Lua configuration file in the
YAML configuration format that was introduced in the previous rel
We are proud to announce the first release candidate of PowerDNS
Recursor 5.1.0!
Compared to the latest 5.0 release, this release adds the possibility
to include settings previously set in the Lua configuration file in the
YAML configuration format that was introduced in the previou
Today we have released PowerDNS Recursor 4.9.7 and 5.0.7.
These releases are maintenance releases that fix a few bugs. The most
important ones are:
* Fix TCP case for policy tags to not produce cached tags in protobuf
messages.
* Remove potential double SOA records if th
Release of PowerDNS Recursor 5.1.0
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 5.1.0!
Compared to the latest 5.0 release, this release adds the possibility
to include settings previously set in the Lua configuration file in the
YAML configuration format that was introduc
Release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.9.8, 5.0.8 and 5.1.1
Today we have released PowerDNS Recursor 4.9.8, 5.0.8 and 5.1.1.
These releases are maintenance releases that fix a few bugs and has a
few improvements. The most important ones are:
* Write the right SOA into an RPZ dumpfile.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:33:17AM +0200, Prochazka via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i upgraded one of the 5.0.x recursor to 5.1.1 from pdns repo. We have
> modifications in the /etc/powerdns/recursor.d/recursor-local.conf in the
> non-yaml syntax. After upgrade i see /etc/recursor.conf include
>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:16:22AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:33:17AM +0200, Prochazka via Pdns-users wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > i upgraded one of the 5.0.x recursor to 5.1.1 from pdns repo. We have
> > modifications i
exception="PDNSException"
> 2024-08-30T11:15:19.618127+02:00 hostname systemd[1]: pdns-recursor.service:
> Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
> 2024-08-30T11:15:19.618355+02:00 hostname systemd[1]: pdns-recursor.service:
> Failed with result 'exit-code'
OBOn Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:43:11AM +0100, Brian Candler via Pdns-users wrote:
> At https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/yamlsettings.html it says:
>
> /Starting with version 5.1.0, in the absence of a recursor.yml file, an
> existing recursor.conf will be processed as YAML, if that fails, it will
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 12:06:19PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> On 10/09/2024 11:56, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Whether to read .yml or .conf include files is determined by the
> > format of mai settings file, not the name.
>
> I understand that.
>
> Let me rephrase: is a brand new installation g
(via: https://blog.powerdns.com/2019/07/15/powerdns-recursor-4-2-0-released/)
July 15, 2019
PowerDNS Recursor 4.2.0 Released
We’re proud to announce version 4.2.0 for the PowerDNS Recursor 4.2 release
train.
The 4.2.0 release of the PowerDNS Recursor brings a lot of small, incremental
change
First alpha release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.0
We are proud to announce the first alpha release for the PowerDNS
Recursor 4.3 release train. Two major features are introduced:
o A relaxed form of QName Minimization as described in rfc7816bis-01 [1]
has been implemented. To test this fea
Third alpha release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.0
==
We’re proud to announce the third alpha release for the PowerDNS
Recursor 4.3 release train. Note that a second alpha was tagged, but
never released due to an issue found. A few major features are introdu
Hello,
Today we released PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.15.
This is a maintenance release that fixes a few issues. In particular, a
very slow creeping memory leak is plugged and an rare failure to resolve
specific names when the "dnssec" configuration is set to "validate" has
been fixed.
Please refer to
Hello,
Today we released PowerDNS Recursor 4.2.1.
This is a maintenance release that fixes a few issues. In particular, a
very slow creeping memory leak is plugged and an rare failure to resolve
specific names when the "dnssec" configuration is set to "validate" has
been fixed.
Please refer to t
It looks like the rec_control line your snmpd.conf is triggering the
problem. Likely the snmd subsystem starts rec_control as a user that
does not have permission to write into /var/run/pdns-recursor.
You can try disabling (by commenting it out) the
extend pdns-rec /usr/local/bin/pdns_stats
line
Hello,
(via:
https://blog.powerdns.com/2020/01/16/second-beta-release-of-powerdns-recursor-4-3-0/
)
We are proud to announce the second beta release of what should become
PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.0.
Compared to the first beta release, this release fixes a two bugs
related to DNSSEC validation. Addi
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 01:29:25AM +0300, Gencer W. Genç via Pdns-users wrote:
> Update: I have redefined all records i think i made a mistake on some
> records. However, I still get infinite wildcard issues.
That's the way DNS wildcards work. Non-intuitive and full of surprises.
See e.g. https:/
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 03:15:02PM +0100, Steinar Haug via Pdns-users wrote:
> I have previously used PowerDNS recursor and RPZ while treating all
> query sources equally. This works fine.
>
> I'm now trying to use RPZ to block copyright type domains selectively
> based on source IP from the quer
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:06:10PM +0100, Steinar Haug via Pdns-users wrote:
> >> I have previously used PowerDNS recursor and RPZ while treating all
> >> query sources equally. This works fine.
> >>
> >> I'm now trying to use RPZ to block copyright type domains selectively
> >> based on source I
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:34:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:06:10PM +0100, Steinar Haug via Pdns-users wrote:
>
> > >> I have previously used PowerDNS recursor and RPZ while treating all
> > >> query so
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the second and hopefully last release candidate
of what should become PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.0.
Compared to the first release candidate, this release candidate changes
the way RPZ policies are processed: if the matched policy is passthru,
policies with a higher pri
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 08:41:15AM +0100, Steinar Haug via Pdns-users wrote:
> >> > Thank you, that got me a bit further. But I'm not where I want to be
> >> > yet. DNSQuestion.variable will let me decide whether an answer should
> >> > be inserted into the packet cache or not. But using this in t
(via https://blog.powerdns.com/2020/03/03/powerdns-recursor-4-3-0-released/)
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.0.
Compared to the last release candidate, only two very minor issues were
fixed.
Compared to the 4.2 release of PowerDNS Recursor, the most importa
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Winfried Angele via Pdns-users wrote:
>
>
> Hello Otto,
>
> Am 3. März 2020 10:33:11 MEZ schrieb Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users
> >...
> >* When the recursor is started by systemd, the recursor will no longer
> >run a
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:30:39AM +, Rahal Sami via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to have a setting disable-any-meta-query-type=yes in pdns.conf
> like this :
> dig +nodnssec +short @ns5.cloudflare.com. ANY cloudflare.com
> "RFC8482" ""
>
>
> I use pdns version 3 .
Short versio
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:18:18AM +, Francis Turner via Pdns-users wrote:
> All,
>
>
> As you may know ThreatSTOP provides an RPZ service and it works on power DNS.
> What doesn't quite work is logging and I'm trying to fix that.
>
>
> My problem is that the documentation for what is out
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 06:52:23PM +0200, Giovanni Vecchi via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> how to configure both auth and recursor to log only on syslog facility (and
> not on stdout)?
> From docu it seems that syslog logging is an addition only.
daemon=yes stops the logging to stdout.
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the first alpha release of what should become
PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.0.
This release contains various bug fixes, improvements and new
features. The most important new features are
* Native DNS64[1] support, without the need to use Lua.
* The ability to add custom
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 03:36:39PM +, Francis Turner via Pdns-users wrote:
> In re
> "* The ability to add custom tags[2] to RPZ hits."
>
> What is the best way to give some specific feedback / feature improvement
> requests?
A github issue would be appropriate, please include specifics and
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 11:31:21AM -0500, Sergio P Cesar via Pdns-users wrote:
> I am new with pdns, just installed a resolver 4.3.0-rc2 to learn and all
> seems to work but stumbled into an issue I cant resolve.
>
> My mailserver failed to deliver email to a few domains, in tracking it I
> found
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 07:05:48AM -0500, Sergio P Cesar wrote:
> It is not a guessing game, the recursor fail to resolve.
You initial email did not specify which name(s) were queried. Only
later in the thread you list an example. Only with yor latest reply
you tell something about your config.
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:20:46PM +0300, Cristian Seres via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of three authoritative name servers (ns3) which uses authoritative
> version 4.2.2 gives older serial number than the other two which use version
> 4.1.13.
>
> MySQL sync is working properly and as far a
Hello!,
Today we are releasing PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.1, 4.2.2. and 4.1.16,
containing security fixes for three CVEs:
- CVE-2020-10995[1]
- CVE-2020-12244[2]
- CVE-2020-10030[3]
The issues are:
CVE-2020-10995: An issue in the DNS protocol has been found that allows
malicious parties to use recur
On 2020-05-20 12:35, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> The new packages aren't available for Raspbian yet; would someone
> check the build systems for Raspbian? Thanks.
The builds are slow, the packages should become available soon.
-Otto
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 4:58 AM Otto Moerbeek via
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:44:03PM +0200, Steinar Haug via Pdns-users wrote:
> We recently upgraded from Recursor 4.2.1 to 4.3.1, due to the recent
> security alert. Unfortunately, after this upgrade some queries have
> stopped working.
>
> The examples below are from a test installation where th
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Steffan via Pdns-users wrote:
> No there not its a ip[range here in the country
> Ans looks like it is connected to ADSL lines
>
> But is it harmless?
Yes. The message is a bit cryptic but it means the auth server
supplied an answer containing trailing g
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 08:29:39PM +0100, Brian Candler via Pdns-users wrote:
> I am trying to get dnstap to work with pdns-recursor 4.3.1-1pdns.bionic from
> the powerdns repo, under Ubuntu 18.04, but failing.
>
> I want to send to a remote network destination. I've added one line to
> /etc/pow
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 08:13:11AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> On 22/06/2020 07:03, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > AF 2 is inet, not inet6, in /usr/include/sys/socket.h on my (OpenBSD)
> > machine:
> >
> > #define AF_INET 2
>
> Ah I see, I was going by pdns/dnstap.proto:
>
> // SocketFamily
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:57:13AM +, Bill Pye via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm a home user of your excellent software and by no means an expert in DNS.
> A while ago I was experimenting with setting-up rpz files on my DNS servers,
> that all worked OK. Recently I've been trying to c
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:07:07AM +, Bill Pye via Pdns-users wrote:
> As a follow-up to my last post I have a question (or two) about using a mysql
> cluster as the backend and using rpz.
>
> First, where does PDNS-recursor store the download zone for an rpz, is it in
> the mysql db or an
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:11:30PM +0200, Michael Rommel via Pdns-users wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> a while ago (2020-03-01) I asked about setting up domains with LUA
> createForward()
> records.
>
> I suceeded in setting it up and found some peculiarities, which I would like
> to
> discuss her
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:28:38AM +0200, Michael Rommel wrote:
> Hi Otto,
>
> thanks for the pointer! AFAICT it covers my patches as well, looks a lot more
> complicated, though. I'll take a closer look at it.
>
> Is there any reason, why it hasn't been merged yet? Any cases that would
> brea
Hello!,
Today we are releasing PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.2, 4.2.3. and 4.1.17,
containing a security fix for CVE-2020-14196: Access restriction
bypass[0].
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor where the ACL applied to
the internal web server via `webserver-allow-from` is not properly
enforced,
Hello!,
Today we are releasing PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.3 and 4.2.4.
These releases fix an issue where the refresh time of a loaded RPZ
zone was ignored. A DNSSEC issue that could lead to zones being marked
Bogus wrongly and a few other DNSSEC related issues were also fixed.
Please refer to the 4
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 12:29:05PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer via Pdns-users
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:41:00PM +0200,
> Remi Gacogne via dnsdist wrote
> a message of 84 lines which said:
>
> > While we expected the third release candidate for dnsdist 1.5.0 to be
> > the last one, a
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the second alpha release of what should
become PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.0.
Compared to the first alpha release, this release mostly contains bug
fixes and code cleanup. In particular, fixes already backported to the
4.3 release branch are included and a bug in the ne
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the first beta release of what should become
PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.0.
Compared to the last alpha release, this release contains new features
with respect to RPZ processing (in particular chasing of CNAMES from
an RPZ and better logging of RPZ hit information in pr
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:44:37AM +0200, Christian Degenkolb via Pdns-users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope somebody on the ML can help me figure out what I'm doing wrong.
> I have a local pdns_recursor (version 4.1.11-1+deb10u1 from debian 10)
> runing and added it at the top of my /etc/resolve.conf a
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:05:40AM +, Markus Ehrlicher via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hello together,
>
> can anyone reproduce this problem or should I open a ticket on github?
I wanted to look into this, but I did not have time yet. Without
looking at the code but knowing some details of the auth
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:22:31AM +0200, Christian Degenkolb wrote:
> (send again, first answer was not send cc to the ML)
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for not sending any configs. pdns_recursor runs more or less with the
> vanilla config with the following changes:
>
> forward-zones-recurse=zen.spamhaus
Hello!,
Today we are releasing PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.4.
This release:
- fixes an issue where certain CNAMEs could lead to resolver failure,
- fixes an issue with the hostname reported in Carbon messages,
- allows for multiple recursor services to run under systemd.
Please refer to the changelog
On 2020-09-09 10:55, Michael Ströder via Pdns-users wrote:
> On 9/8/20 11:49 AM, Remi Gacogne via Pdns-users wrote:
>> On 9/8/20 11:39 AM, Michael Ströder via Pdns-users wrote:
>>
>>> Currently building PowerDNS Recursor fails building on openSUSE
>>> Tumbleweed/Factory:
>>
>> It's an issue cause
On 2020-09-09 11:14, Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-09-09 10:55, Michael Ströder via Pdns-users wrote:
>> On 9/8/20 11:49 AM, Remi Gacogne via Pdns-users wrote:
>>> On 9/8/20 11:39 AM, Michael Ströder via Pdns-users wrote:
>>>
>>>&g
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:23:27AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:05:40AM +, Markus Ehrlicher via Pdns-users
> wrote:
>
> > Hello together,
> >
> > can anyone reproduce this problem or should I open a ticket on github?
On 2020-09-09 11:39, Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-09-09 11:14, Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2020-09-09 10:55, Michael Ströder via Pdns-users wrote:
>>> On 9/8/20 11:49 AM, Remi Gacogne via Pdns-users wrote:
>>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 03:40:54PM +0200, Christian Degenkolb via Pdns-users
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> what is a reasonable low value for udp-truncation-threshold? I tried with
> 900 and 600 (as low as half the default value) but found no improvements.
Try edns-outgoing-bufsize, that is the one t
Hello!
We are proud to announce the second release candidate of what should
become PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.0.
Compared to the first release candidate, this release contains a few
enhancements and fixes a few bugs. In particular, DS records of
forwarded zones are handles properly and the parsing of
Hello!,
Today we are releasing PowerDNS Recursor 4.3.5, 4.2.5. and 4.1.18,
containing a security fix for CVE-2020-25829[1]:
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor where a remote attacker
can cause the cached records for a given name to be updated to the
Bogus DNSSEC validation state, instea
Hello!
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.0.
Compared to the last release candidate, this release contains a fix
for the cache pollution issue described in security advisory
2020-07[1]. Please refer to the changelog[2] for details.
Compared to the 4.3 release of PowerD
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:32:29PM +0300, Egor Fatyushin via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hello,
> I have two authoritative DNS servers and I'd like to use them as two
> replicas with the same set of records. Can I use 'forward-zones' for both
> failover and load balancing features.
>
> I mean, if I have
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:41:18PM +0100, Roman Steinhart via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We're running two PowerDNS authoritative instances v4.3.0/4.3.1 (upgraded
> today) with a self-written remote backend.
>
> From time to time we see small, 1-2 minute long spikes of servfail
> responses
Hello!,
Today we are releasing PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.1 and 4.3.6.
These releases fix a bug where a reply from an authoritative server
could get lost, causing timeouts or ServFail answers to
clients. Additionally, an issue resolving CNAMEs of the form a.b.c
CNAME x.a.b.c when QName Minimization is
Hello!
Today we are releasing PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.2.
This release fixes a bug where the wrong type could be used while
verifying DNSSEC signatures, causing domains to be incorrectly marked
as Bogus. Additionally, the recursor no longer resolves unneeded names
when chasing CNAME records if QName
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the first alpha release of what should
become PowerDNS Recursor 4.5.0. This release contains various bug
fixes, improvements and new features.
The upcoming 4.5.0 release features a re-worked negative cache that
is shared between threads, allowing mo
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the third alpha release of what should
become PowerDNS Recursor 4.5.0. This release contains various bug
fixes, improvements and new features. The second alpha was an
internal release only and never went public.
The upcoming 4.5.0 release includes a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 07:56:07AM +0100, Hans Seidel via Pdns-users wrote:
> unfortunately, the identify field does not work since it just contains the
> string "DNS". I will probably file a feature request via github as next
> step.
The recursor fills in the value of server-id, which can be set
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:09:11PM +, Brian Candler via Pdns-users wrote:
> On 26/03/2021 11:59, Wafa BEN KHOUD via Pdns-users wrote:
> > Please, can you describe me how upgrade pdns authoritative from 4.1.3 to
> > 4.4.1?
>
> 1. Read the release notes for the intervening major versions, in pa
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the first beta release of what should become
PowerDNS Recursor 4.5.0. This release contains various bug fixes,
improvements and new features.
This first beta contains a rewrite of the way zone cuts are determined,
reducing the number of outgoing que
Hello!
Today we are releasing PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.3.
This release fixes a bug where corrupted Newly Discovered Domain files
could crash the recursor on startup and a bug where the wrong TTL could
be used when inserting records into the packet cache. Additionally, a
few minor DNS
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 02:40:17PM +, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
> We recently replaced some Bind servers with PowerDNS recursor, and were
> rather surprised to see CPU usage essentially double for the same workload.
> My expectation was that the load would be more or less equivale
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 05:30:11PM +, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
Some thoughts:
2 distributior thread feels a bit overkill, 1 distributor thread
should be able to feed 8 workers. Did you do measurements to come to
this value?
Your maintenance function looks like it could run for a w
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:18:33PM +, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
> Both 4.4/5 and proxy protocol were on my radar, but my priority was to
> address the CPU usage. If there's performance gains to be had in upgrading,
> I can certainly do that. Is 4.5GA likely to happen soon?
expec
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:49:59PM +0100, Tony Finch via Pdns-users wrote:
> Seth Mattinen via Pdns-users wrote:
> >
> > Here's a partial trace (list refused posting the full trace). From my eye it
> > looks like I'm just getting ServFail from cloudflare NS, or possibly a
> > DNSSEC
> > validati
See https://docs.powerdns.com/authoritative/upgrading.html
-Otto
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 01:25:29PM +, tach yon via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Oh I see, there was a syntax change that I didn't encounter whilst testing on
> a temporary slave. Good to know, thanks!
>
> Also
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the second beta release of what should become
PowerDNS Recursor 4.5.0. Compared to the first beta release, this
release contains a few bug fixes and improvements, in particular a
bugfix concerning zones with "Stranded DNSKEYSs", zones that are signed
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the first release candidate of what should
become PowerDNS Recursor 4.5.0. Compared to the last beta release, this
release contains a few minor bug fixes and improvements.
Compared to the previous major (4.4) release of PowerDNS Recursor, this
relea
Hello!
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.5.1.
Compared to the release candidate, this release contains two bug fixes.
Note that 4.5.0 was never released publicly, since an issue was found
during QA.
Compared to the previous major (4.4) release of PowerDNS
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 07:01:08PM +0200, Michael Ströder via Pdns-users wrote:
> HI!
>
> Was support for running on 32-bit platforms dropped?
>
> configure fails with:
>
> configure: error: size of time_t is 4, which is not large enough to fix
> the y2k38 bug
>
> See build system:
>
> https:
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:59:08PM +, Francis Turner via Pdns-users wrote:
> I see the email about the dropping of support for 32 bit environments, which
> includes Raspbian. Are you planning on making arm64 builds available?
>
>
> Either the (beta not entirely released, but works) 64 bit R
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 07:05:02PM -0500, Tod Sandman via Pdns-users wrote:
> I have been successfully exporting DNS queries via protobufServer, but I have
> now been requested to not export PTR lookups. I removed PTR queries from the
> protobufServer exportTypes:
>
> < {'A', '', 'CNAME',
Hello!
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.4. and
4.5.2. Both releases contain mostly smaller bug fixes. For the 4.5.2
release the default value of nsec3-max-iterations[1] has been lowered
to 150, in accordance with new guidelines[2] and in coordination with
Hello!
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.5.4. This
release contains a fix to an issue where the answer to a non-existent
DS query was missing a SOA record. In particular this can be a problem
if PowerDNS Recursor is used as a forwarding target by a validating
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 10:45:12AM +, Ralph via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi together,
>
> I have a simple question:
> Can someone please tell me what’s the time interval of the „numbers“ section
> on the PowerDNS recursor web gui?
> There are lots of remote ips with query numbers. I can‘t find
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.5. and
4.5.5.
Both releases contain an improvement to work around broken
authoritative servers sending replies without the "authoritative
answer" (AA) bit set.
The 4.5.5 release contains a fix to an issue whe
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 11:11:42AM +0100, Kim Covil via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't managed to find a similar issue while searching. We are testing
> Vyos 1.4 which uses powerdns recursor as its caching/forwarding name
> service. We have noticed a behaviour change between pdns-recursor
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 06:20:16PM +0200, Peter van Dijk via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 13:53 +0200, Thomas Mieslinger via Pdns-users
> wrote:
> > dog.80 IN NSEC domains. NS DS RRSIG NSEC
>
> This looks like aggressive NSEC reuse (
> https://d
We are proud to announce the first alpha release of PowerDNS Recursor
4.6.0.
Compared to the previous major (4.5) release of PowerDNS Recursor, this
release contains two major sets of changes:
* a rewrite of the outgoing TCP code, adding both re-use of
connections and supp
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.6.
This release contains fixes to the way RPZ updates are handled and a
fix to a case where traffic to a forwarder could be throttled while it
should not.
Please refer to the [1]change log for additional deta
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.5.6.
This release contains fixes to the way RPZ updates are handled and a
fix to a case where traffic to a forwarder could be throttled while it
should not. Additionally a few minor DNSSEC validation issues and a
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 06:43:59PM +0200, Christoph via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi Remi,
>
> Remi Gacogne wrote:
> > This counter is increased when we encounter a network issue that does
> > not seem to be caused by the remote end but by a problem on our side,
> > like if the recursor runs out of fil
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the second alpha release of PowerDNS Recursor
4.6.0.
Compared to the previous major (4.5) release of PowerDNS Recursor, this
release contains several sets of changes:
* A rewrite of the outgoing TCP code, adding both re-use of
connection
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:20:59PM +0200, Christoph via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to calculate the overall percentage of
> queries that got completely answered with a cached entry,
> regardless of the type of cache (packet cache or not) and regardless
> of whether the cache was in d
Hello!,
We are proud to announce the release of PowerDNS Recursor 4.4.7. and
4.5.7.
Both releases are maintenance releases correcting an issue where a DS
record with a SHA-256 digest could be ignored if a DS record with
SHA-384 digest is also present. The 4.5.7 release also contain
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo