Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I discovered today that I had forgotten to put 'use strict' at the top of > one of my modules...it was in the script that _used_ the module, but not > in the module itself. Putting it in instantly caught several annoying > bugs that I'd been trying to track down. > > It would be nice if there was a > > use strict 'recursive'; Good reasoning, although this occurs to me as trying to kill a fly with a nuclear bomb. The essence of modules is that they are independent, and are unaffected by outside pragmata. This is what makes them reusable. A 'recursive' pragma would break that. -- Johan
- as long as we are discussing 'nice to have's... Dave Storrs
- pragma adverbs/attributes Me
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to have's.... Uri Guttman
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to have's.... Dan Sugalski
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to have's.... Bart Lateur
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to have's.... Dan Brian
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to have's.... schwern
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to have's.... Johan Vromans
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to hav... Dave Storrs
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to have's.... Dave Storrs
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to hav... Uri Guttman
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to hav... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to have's.... Dave Storrs
- Re: as long as we are discussing 'nice to hav... Bryan C. Warnock