On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Johan Vromans wrote:
> What I wanted to indicate is that the input and output handling of the
> debugger, currently line input and line output, should not be turned
> into a sophisticated user interface with command line recall/editing
> and fancy output paging (e.g. two in
[Quoting Dave Storrs, on September 26 2000, 11:47, in "Re: RFC 292 (v1) Ext"]
> I'm confused...are you suggesting that the debugger should no
> longer be integrated into perl?
Absolutely not!
What I wanted to indicate is that the input and output handling of the
debugger, currently line in
On 26 Sep 2000, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Perl6 RFC Librarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The ability to easily retrieve and edit your N most recent commands to the
> > debugger (much like a bash_history).
> and
> > A better default pager. The default pager should assume a 24x80 term
> > win
Perl6 RFC Librarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The ability to easily retrieve and edit your N most recent commands to the
> debugger (much like a bash_history).
and
> A better default pager. The default pager should assume a 24x80 term
> window ...
To me, these clearly indicates that the d
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 07:34:04PM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most of this RFC would probably be better off in perl6-stdlib; the debugger
isn't really part of the language. That being said, however...
> The ability to easily retrieve and edit your N mos
