Saneesh Apte wrote:
I think I found two bugs (and I hope I am not wasting everyone's time).
One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT
instead or java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be
aliases for the same type?
Types.BOOLEAN does not exis
Hi,
I think I found two bugs (and I hope I am not wasting everyone's
time).
One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT
instead or java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these
be aliases for the same type?
And secondly the returned type from a s
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Saneesh Apte wrote:
One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT
instead or java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be
aliases for the same type?
These are aliases for the same type. I believe we accept either BOOLEAN
or BIT as
Saneesh Apte wrote:
> the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT instead or
> java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be
> aliases for the same type?
>
> And secondly the returned type from a smallint[] is an Integer[]
> instead of a Short[].
Should the objects in
Hi,
I think I found two bugs (and I hope I am not wasting everyone's time).
One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT instead or
java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be aliases for
the same type?
And secondly the returned type from a smal