Doc: document the current-transaction-modes GUCs.
We had documentation of default_transaction_isolation et al,
but for some reason not of transaction_isolation et al.
AFAICS this is just an ancient oversight, so repair.
Per bug #17077 from Yanliang Lei.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17077-ade8
Doc: document the current-transaction-modes GUCs.
We had documentation of default_transaction_isolation et al,
but for some reason not of transaction_isolation et al.
AFAICS this is just an ancient oversight, so repair.
Per bug #17077 from Yanliang Lei.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17077-ade8
Doc: document the current-transaction-modes GUCs.
We had documentation of default_transaction_isolation et al,
but for some reason not of transaction_isolation et al.
AFAICS this is just an ancient oversight, so repair.
Per bug #17077 from Yanliang Lei.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17077-ade8
Doc: document the current-transaction-modes GUCs.
We had documentation of default_transaction_isolation et al,
but for some reason not of transaction_isolation et al.
AFAICS this is just an ancient oversight, so repair.
Per bug #17077 from Yanliang Lei.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17077-ade8
Doc: document the current-transaction-modes GUCs.
We had documentation of default_transaction_isolation et al,
but for some reason not of transaction_isolation et al.
AFAICS this is just an ancient oversight, so repair.
Per bug #17077 from Yanliang Lei.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17077-ade8
Doc: document the current-transaction-modes GUCs.
We had documentation of default_transaction_isolation et al,
but for some reason not of transaction_isolation et al.
AFAICS this is just an ancient oversight, so repair.
Per bug #17077 from Yanliang Lei.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17077-ade8
Doc: document the current-transaction-modes GUCs.
We had documentation of default_transaction_isolation et al,
but for some reason not of transaction_isolation et al.
AFAICS this is just an ancient oversight, so repair.
Per bug #17077 from Yanliang Lei.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17077-ade8
Make new replication slot test code less racy
The new test code added in ead9e51e8236 is racy -- it hinges on
shared-memory state, which changes before the WARNING message is logged.
Put it the other way around.
Backpatch to 13.
Author: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210716180
Make new replication slot test code less racy
The new test code added in ead9e51e8236 is racy -- it hinges on
shared-memory state, which changes before the WARNING message is logged.
Put it the other way around.
Backpatch to 13.
Author: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210716180
Make new replication slot test code less racy
The new test code added in ead9e51e8236 is racy -- it hinges on
shared-memory state, which changes before the WARNING message is logged.
Put it the other way around.
Backpatch to 13.
Author: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210716180
10 matches
Mail list logo
