Hi
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 10/22/2016 07:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> I wrote:
>>>
>>> The only other Windows machines in the buildfarm that are building
>>> with openssl are Andrew's bowerbird and frogmouth; they're both passing.
>>> I wonder what openssl
On 24 October 2016 12:33:49 EEST, Dave Page wrote:
>Hi
>
>On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>wrote:
>> Any chance you could update the OpenSSL versions on those systems, or
>> failing that, remove --with-openssl?
>
>Well I could. But really, how useful is that given that it's
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
>
> On 24 October 2016 12:33:49 EEST, Dave Page wrote:
>>Hi
>>
>>On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>>wrote:
>>> Any chance you could update the OpenSSL versions on those systems, or
>>> failing that, remove --with-op
Preserve commit timestamps across clean restart
An oversight in setting the boundaries of known commit timestamps during
startup caused old commit timestamps to become inaccessible after a
server restart.
Author and reporter: Julien Rouhaud
Review, test code: Craig Ringer
Branch
--
REL9_6_ST
Preserve commit timestamps across clean restart
An oversight in setting the boundaries of known commit timestamps during
startup caused old commit timestamps to become inaccessible after a
server restart.
Author and reporter: Julien Rouhaud
Review, test code: Craig Ringer
Branch
--
REL9_5_ST
Preserve commit timestamps across clean restart
An oversight in setting the boundaries of known commit timestamps during
startup caused old commit timestamps to become inaccessible after a
server restart.
Author and reporter: Julien Rouhaud
Review, test code: Craig Ringer
Branch
--
master
D
Dave Page writes:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I'm ok with removing them from the buildfarm, if you feel that way.
> Andrew, Tom - any thoughts on removing them (just from head and future
> branches)?
I'd prefer the solution of disabling --with-openssl. If y
I have following warning while compiling with clang.
walmethods.c:437:9: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is
always false [-Wtautological-compare]
if (r < 0)
~ ^ ~
1 warning generated.
It seems that 'r' should be 'ssize_t' instead of 'size_t'.
--
Update release notes for last-minute commit timestamp fix.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/30a6f98ed8a2223ef876197b5dea0d94e5807b51
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml | 12
doc/src/sgml/release-9.6.sgml | 18 ++
Update release notes for last-minute commit timestamp fix.
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b9a728ef45fcfd93aa2efafb6876d2a946793f95
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml | 12
doc/src/sgml/release-9.6.sgml | 18
Update release notes for last-minute commit timestamp fix.
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a5c76651e94b8b8598f99380ad84071aa11f9222
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
Translation updates
Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: 2c7265d5e5c1d7858c6636bd366f28c41ed5173e
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/ffaa8bcf0e65f7f8095d04aeaba6953e52af8c12
Modified Files
-
On 10/24/2016 08:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Page writes:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
I'm ok with removing them from the buildfarm, if you feel that way.
Andrew, Tom - any thoughts on removing them (just from head and future
branches)?
I'd prefer the soluti
Translation updates
Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: e4e428572533133cac4ecefd69d251a0b5674fa3
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/681fdbbff1cd44963883c27007f10e1a8c4e65de
Modified Files
-
Translation updates
Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: 475f2bcc7c56f293db4e62d31f85b3bfc0f9f279
Branch
--
REL9_4_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/117add5fd848df3def3196bfb7645382cd51
Modified Files
-
Translation updates
Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: fe0d5c56ab1b2599e37d41f639be97ac6947ee69
Branch
--
REL9_1_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3a018d2fbb67ae5b2f8dc0e7e6512e856d33a5e6
Modified Files
-
Translation updates
Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: 4536e21f450b2265a262f9f9acf912ae5416a1ee
Branch
--
REL9_2_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/89dabaf4a256d2c07c143af125db575cc59ae114
Modified Files
-
Translation updates
Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: 94e3c920ffab0c5cd555a4afab49e4606bc00cee
Branch
--
REL9_3_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/959853027a6b2bf5e532ce81f8b9d2fa28a72d1a
Modified Files
-
Use ssize_t where signed results can happen
Noted by Alexander Korotkov
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/2dde01ccbfb4c53c7edd28a6836ba47303fea0ba
Modified Files
--
src/bin/pg_basebackup/walmethods.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Alexander Korotkov <
a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I have following warning while compiling with clang.
>
> walmethods.c:437:9: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is
> always false [-Wtautological-compare]
> if (r < 0)
>
Stamp 9.6.1.
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/16e7c02c423449697b78ca857e5847981785e9ed
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.in | 2 +-
doc/bug.template
Stamp 9.5.5.
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/811b6c4a1df5d8323b532460ef2157e771dfb358
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.in | 2 +-
doc/bug.template
Stamp 9.3.15.
Branch
--
REL9_3_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/59a0c01e3d88910e92a24e388f346670f4f696ef
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.in | 2 +-
doc/bug.template
Stamp 9.4.10.
Branch
--
REL9_4_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c7681b2b9a115eb05048a485480826bc0efa6d3b
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.in | 2 +-
doc/bug.template
Stamp 9.2.19.
Branch
--
REL9_2_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b3453562b349a104b92ff02289cf41ff09a8a875
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.in | 2 +-
doc/bug.template
Stamp 9.1.24.
Branch
--
REL9_1_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/e85493559c4678f54d30b6b4e04b17c03a3192d7
Modified Files
--
configure| 18 +-
configure.in | 2 +-
doc/bug.template
postgres_fdw: Try again to stabilize aggregate pushdown regression tests.
A query that only aggregates one row isn't a great argument for pushdown,
and buildfarm member brolga decides against it. Adjust the query a bit
in the hopes of getting remote aggregation to win consistently.
Jeevan Chalke
27 matches
Mail list logo
