> Agreed. I am starting a list of what can/need to be indexed on pgsql docs
> site as I'm working to build a new site with pgsql as a backend. I
> think Tom Lane > suggested that.. I would like to know where I can send
> the list. It'll probably somekind of a work in progress. So if everyone
>
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Most of the synopsis areas for DROP commands use "name" as the
> identifier, while some areas do not.
>
> The attached converts be below to "n
When building postgres.tar.gz I get the following errors:
make -C sgml clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/postgresql-7.4/pgsql/doc/src/sgml'
rm -f HTML.manifest *.html *.gif
rm -rf *.1 *.l man1 manl manpage.refs manpage.links manpage.log
rm -f *.rtf *.tex-ps *.tex-pdf *.dvi *.aux *.
Seems you were caught in mid patch.
They work with cvs sources from 30 minutes ago.
Try updating and re-running -- the last error in particular was caused
by 2 patches crossing in the night (patch queue).
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 22:52, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> When building postgres.tar.gz I get t
It works here and in the 15 minute build in the developers site.
---
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> When building postgres.tar.gz I get the following errors:
>
> make -C sgml clean
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/po
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 22:52:32 -0400,
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems you were caught in mid patch.
>
> They work with cvs sources from 30 minutes ago.
>
> Try updating and re-running -- the last error in particular was caused
> by 2 patches crossing in the night (patch queue).
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 23:18, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 22:52:32 -0400,
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seems you were caught in mid patch.
> >
> > They work with cvs sources from 30 minutes ago.
> >
> > Try updating and re-running -- the last error in particul
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 23:20:52 -0400,
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you sure you don't have local changes? A conflict perhaps?
I had wiped what I had tonight to get a clean copy from CVS as I had
been testing a patch to fix some problems with sockaddr and wanted to
see if thin
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 22:38:50 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I looked at this and while I don't know SGML I expect that the complaints
> are referring to some unclosed entries that were added in that change.
> They are in the last section of the differences (after line
Found them --- patch applied.
---
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 22:38:50 -0500,
> Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I looked at this and while I don't know SGML I expect that the compla
These changes fixed the problem I was having.
*** datatype.sgml.orig Tue Jun 24 22:41:31 2003
--- datatype.sgml Tue Jun 24 22:42:44 2003
***
*** 2608,2613
--- 2608,2614
10.1.2.3/32
10.1.2.3/32
10.1.2.3/32
+
2001:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 23:51:02 -0400,
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Found them --- patch applied.
Thanks.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
