Re: [DOCS] Bibliography updates for new editions?

2005-02-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 03:20 schrieb Michael Fuhr: > Should entries in the Bibliography be updated to reflect new editions? Sure. Please submit a patch. > Would it be appropriate to add links to Amazon or another bookseller? > If the project would rather not favor a particular retailer, t

Re: [DOCS] How the planner uses statistics

2005-02-15 Thread Robert Treat
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 02:34, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Mark Kirkwood wrote: > >>At Tom's suggestion, I am going to amend the page to fit into the > >>'internals' chapter as opposed to 'performance tips' one. I might do > >>this first, and send you the resulting page. > >

Re: [DOCS] Bibliography updates for new editions?

2005-02-15 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:57:34AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 03:20 schrieb Michael Fuhr: > > Should entries in the Bibliography be updated to reflect new editions? > > Sure. Please submit a patch. Will do. Just wanted to make sure I wouldn't be wasting anybo

Re: [DOCS] How the planner uses statistics

2005-02-15 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Robert Treat wrote: I thought it was more correct to use < rather than < inside of tags? I am unsure about this myself (I copied the usage from perform.sgml). Mark ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregis

Re: [DOCS] Bibliography updates for new editions?

2005-02-15 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:11:58AM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:57:34AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 03:20 schrieb Michael Fuhr: > > > Should entries in the Bibliography be updated to reflect new editions? > > > > Sure. Please submit