Hi Bruce,
As you know, Peter moved the translation stuff to PgFoundry. As a
translator, I'm happy to commit to there since I can do it whenever I
want -- better than sending to the list each time I update.
What about doing the same for FAQ translations? We may have a chance to
assign several tra
> Hi Bruce,
>
> As you know, Peter moved the translation stuff to PgFoundry.
> As a translator, I'm happy to commit to there since I can do
> it whenever I want -- better than sending to the list each
> time I update.
>
> What about doing the same for FAQ translations? We may have a
> chance
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:36 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > What about doing the same for FAQ translations? We may have a
> > chance to assign several translators to each FAQ and we may
> > easily keep them up2date. The website can be configured to
> > pull them from CVS.
> >
> > I can
> > > What about doing the same for FAQ translations? We may
> have a chance
> > > to assign several translators to each FAQ and we may easily keep
> > > them up2date. The website can be configured to pull them from CVS.
> > >
> > > I can assist you during this moving process, if you want.
> >
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:56 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> If we'd move them to a different cvs (be that web or separate project),
> I'd expect them to go away from main cvs? Is there any actual point in
> keeping them in more than one place?
As done in translation project, the main website
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:56 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> > If we'd move them to a different cvs (be that web or separate project),
> > I'd expect them to go away from main cvs? Is there any actual point in
> > keeping them in more than one place?
>
> As done i
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Magnus Hagander wrote:
What about doing the same for FAQ translations? We may
have a chance
to assign several translators to each FAQ and we may easily keep
them up2date. The website can be configured to pull them from CVS.
I can assist you during this moving process, if
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:56 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
If we'd move them to a different cvs (be that web or separate project),
I'd expect them to go away from main cvs? Is there any actual point in
keeping them in more tha
Anjan,
> But, in PostgreSQL all costs are scaled relative to a page fetch. If we
> make both sequential_page_fetch_cost and random_page_cost to "1", then we
> need to increase the various cpu_* paramters by multiplying the default
> values with appropriate Scaling Factor. Now, we need to dete
