Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> - Translation tools may work better with XML sources. (Totally
>>> unconfirmed; would need to be in actual use by someone.)
>> Do you mean language translation or transformation (as in pdf?).
>
> Language translation
>
Honestly, I don't ne
Guillaume LELARGE wrote:
> I also thinks it's easier to
> customize output with XML tools (DSSSL is really hard to understand,
> xslt is way more simple). But that's only *my* opinion.
You also have not read the second paragraph of my mail.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~pe
Peter, Josh,
> > - XML editing tools are more widely available. (Totally unconfirmed
> > assumption; I'm happy with what I have.)
>
> Most XML tools I have ran into also support SGML.
Like which? I've been completely unable to find any tools more sophisticated
than Emacs+SGML that support SGM
Josh Berkus wrote:
Peter, Josh,
- XML editing tools are more widely available. (Totally unconfirmed
assumption; I'm happy with what I have.)
Most XML tools I have ran into also support SGML.
Like which? I've been completely unable to find any tools more sophisticated
than Emacs+SGML that
On 15/07/06, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > - Translation tools may work better with XML sources. (Totally
> > unconfirmed; would need to be in actual use by someone.)
>
> Do you mean language translation or transformation (as in pdf?).
Language translati
