-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All:
I read a thread from July explaining the current status of moving to XML
[1].
Peter, you mention that if someone has a clear need you would be open to
switching. Let me explain the problems I've encountered with SGML.
A few months ago, I spl
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 09:09 -0500, David Blewett wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi All:
>
> I read a thread from July explaining the current status of moving to XML
> [1].
To add to this, it would take minutes to transform XML versus the days
it takes the SGML.
Jos
David Blewett wrote:
> I started work on modifying the SGML to use a set of 3 volumes, split
> at roughly 500 page intervals. I wanted to generate individual ToC's
> and indexes for each volume. I started to modify the SGML to include
> a "role" attribute for each indexterm, to tell what volume it
Peter,
First of all, moving to DocBook XML will not do anything in the way of
improving our output processing abilities. Any tool that you can use
on DocBook SGML can also be used on DocBook XML and vice versa.
As I said then, this is absolutely untrue. OpenOffice.org, for example,
wo
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 13:36 -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Peter,
>
> > First of all, moving to DocBook XML will not do anything in the way of
> > improving our output processing abilities. Any tool that you can use
> > on DocBook SGML can also be used on DocBook XML and vice versa.
> >
>
> A
Josh Berkus wrote:
> As I said then, this is absolutely untrue. OpenOffice.org, for
> example, works with DocBook XML but not SGML.
What does "works" mean?
> There are also a
> plethora of XML editing and publishing tools which can been used for
> Docbook XML which are not available for SGML.
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 21:15 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > As I said then, this is absolutely untrue. OpenOffice.org, for
> > example, works with DocBook XML but not SGML.
>
> What does "works" mean?
You can create, edit, convert, save, and open docbook xml in
OpenOfice.
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> You can create, edit, convert, save, and open docbook xml in
> OpenOfice.org.
Sure, there are more editing options with DocBook XML. No one disputes
that. But the question at hand was about processing the DocBook.
> You are correct but XML does give us more modern and
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 21:58 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > You can create, edit, convert, save, and open docbook xml in
> > OpenOfice.org.
>
> Sure, there are more editing options with DocBook XML. No one disputes
> that. But the question at hand was about processin
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:26, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 21:58 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > You can create, edit, convert, save, and open docbook xml in
> > > OpenOfice.org.
> >
> > Sure, there are more editing options with DocBook XML. No one
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:45 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:26, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 21:58 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > > You can create, edit, convert, save, and open docbook xml in
> > > > OpenOfice.org.
> > >
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:51, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:45 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:26, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 21:58 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > > > You can create, edit, conve
> > OO treats Docbook like a normal document. You will however loose styles
> > (like bold, italic). It does support tables, it understands
> > transformation from things like sect1 (from OO heading1) etc...
> >
> > The style loss is to be expected because Docbook doesn't contain
> > representati
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
OO treats Docbook like a normal document. You will however loose styles
(like bold, italic). It does support tables, it understands
transformation from things like sect1 (from OO heading1) etc...
The style loss is to be expected because Docbook doesn't contain
representati
On 08/12/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a long standing support within the community to move to XML
including:
Josh Berkus
Josh Drake
Robert Treat
Andrew Dunslane
David Blewett
David Fetter
Devrim Gunduz
Darcy Buskermolen
And that is just from #postgresql
And now in
On Dec 7, 2006, at 12:03 AM, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Devrim, could you share your texmf.cnf ? My pdf creation failed even
if I increased memory setting as it's recommended in jadetex
installation.
I had to increase several settings in that file.
http://www.gunduz.org/postgresql/texmf.cnf
ISTM t
16 matches
Mail list logo
