"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I haven't included the customary diffs. This points me to some of the
>> many deficiencies of CVS, namely that I would need write access in
>> order to have it create a diff,
>
> Strange, it works fine for everyo
Gregory Stark wrote:
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I haven't included the customary diffs. This points me to some of the
many deficiencies of CVS, namely that I would need write access in
order to have it create a diff,
Strange, it works fine
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You need write-access to add files, even on anonymouse server. We often get
> patches with new files as separate attachments because of that.
Oh quite right. I had forgotten but that was the original reason I switched to
using rsync. The alternat
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Gregory Stark wrote:
Personally I find CVS so terribly slow for large trees like Postgres that it's
essential to use rsync to maintain a local CVS repository. That makes 'cvs
diff' remarkably fast.
Having recently tried to get this to work right and not quite nailed it
do
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
BTW, is there some trick to getting cvs diff to ignore files that aren't
in the repo?
Trick? That's what it does by default.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4:
"David Fetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:12:23AM +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> >BTW, is there some trick to getting cvs diff to ignore files that
>> >aren't in the repo?
>>
>> Trick? That's what it does by default.
>
> I suspect he's tal
