In the current version of the docs here:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/functions-sequence.html
The lastval() function appears to be missing from table 9-38.
I don't see any obvious reason that it's left out.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
---(end of broa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
attached
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate t
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> attached
Isn't it too verbose? I thought we were moving away with mentioning
every single change? A single entry to mention psql autocomplete
improvements should be OK ...
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/
"We are who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:25:14 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > attached
>
> Isn't it too verbose? I thought we were moving away with mentioning
> every single change? A single entry to mention psql
Looks like we need some docs on all these new plugin APIs we've
introduced in this release.
- PL/pgSQL hooks
- planner hooks
- join order hooks
Thanks,
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: ex
As of CVS HEAD, some of the contrib module documentation pages have
extensive credit screeds, eg
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/cube.html
and some just have the author's name, with or without an link,
and some don't have anything at all.
This bothers me; it seems like we should h
Tom Lane wrote:
As of CVS HEAD, some of the contrib module documentation pages have
extensive credit screeds, eg
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/cube.html
and some just have the author's name, with or without an link,
and some don't have anything at all.
This bothers me; it seem
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> attached
> Isn't it too verbose? I thought we were moving away with mentioning
> every single change? A single entry to mention psql autocomplete
> improvements should be OK ...
AFAIR, past practice is that autocompletion fi
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
attached
Isn't it too verbose? I thought we were moving away with mentioning
every single change? A single entry to mention psql autocomplete
improvements should be OK ...
AFAIR, past practice is that autoc
Tom Lane wrote:
As of CVS HEAD, some of the contrib module documentation pages have
extensive credit screeds, eg
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/cube.html
and some just have the author's name, with or without an link,
and some don't have anything at all.
I don't have a strong
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It might be worth reminding folks that the release notes do not
>> exist for the purpose of mentioning contributors.
> Then why do we mention them at all in the release notes?
You've got the motivation backwards. We mention the r
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...Further those who have provided reasonable contribution really should be
> mentioned on the contributors page that is up for discussion which would
> make the rest of this moot yes?
I don't have any objection to listing people on the contributor
Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...Further those who have provided reasonable contribution really should be
mentioned on the contributors page that is up for discussion which would
make the rest of this moot yes?
I don't have any objection to listing people on th
Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
It might be worth reminding folks that the release notes do not
exist for the purpose of mentioning contributors.
Then why do we mention them at all in the release notes?
You've got the motivation backwards. We
14 matches
Mail list logo
