I have determined that the HTML documentation must be built before any
of the PDF makefile targets are valid, so I have applied the attached
documentation patch to mention this.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ I
In building the US PDF documentation I am getting this error from LaTeX:
LaTeX Warning: Reference `RELEASE-8-2-7' on page xxxii undefined on
input line
37586.
LaTeX Warning: Reference `101577' on page xxxii undefined on input line
37612.
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I have determined that the HTML documentation must be built before any
> of the PDF makefile targets are valid, so I have applied the attached
> documentation patch to mention this.
Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you observe
to go wrong?
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I used to be able to build the PDF documentation. I am curious what
> changes others have made to allow PDF documentation builds.
All the 8.4.x releases have built as PDF for me, using the current
docbook/tex tool chain on Fedora 11; and in fact I don't remember
ever seei
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I have determined that the HTML documentation must be built before any
> > of the PDF makefile targets are valid, so I have applied the attached
> > documentation patch to mention this.
>
> Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you obs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I used to be able to build the PDF documentation. I am curious what
> > changes others have made to allow PDF documentation builds.
>
> All the 8.4.x releases have built as PDF for me, using the current
> docbook/tex tool chain on Fedora 11; and in fac
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you observe
>> to go wrong?
> $ gmake postgres-A4.pdf
> gmake: *** No rule to make target `postgres-A4.pdf'. Stop.
Works for me ... sure you've got a clean copy of the makefile?
Bruce Momjian writes:
> My version is:
> openjade:I: "openjade" version "1.3.2"
> openjade:I: "OpenSP" version "1.5"
> Is there some other version I should check. I used to be able to build
> the PDF docs, so has anything changed that would have broken my tools?
Dunno, here are som
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you observe
> >> to go wrong?
>
> > $ gmake postgres-A4.pdf
> > gmake: *** No rule to make target `postgres-A4.pdf'. Stop.
>
> Works for me ... sure you've got a clea
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Wow, that is odd then. I pulled down a new copy of CVS, ran configure,
> and got the same result:
> $ gmake postgres.pdf
> Makefile:172: *** Invalid target; use postgres-A4.pdf or
> postgres-US.pdf as targets. Stop.
> $ gmake postgres-A4.pdf
>
On fre, 2010-01-22 at 11:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> [32.0.18
> pdfTeX error (ext4): link annotations can't be nested.
A random web search suggests that a newer TeX might be a good try.
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your
On fre, 2010-01-22 at 12:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Wow, that is odd then. I pulled down a new copy of CVS, ran configure,
> > and got the same result:
>
> > $ gmake postgres.pdf
> > Makefile:172: *** Invalid target; use postgres-A4.pdf or
> > postgres-US.
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2010-01-22 at 12:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > Wow, that is odd then. I pulled down a new copy of CVS, ran configure,
> > > and got the same result:
> >
> > > $ gmake postgres.pdf
> > > Makefile:172: *** Invalid target; use postg
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2010-01-22 at 11:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > [32.0.18
> > pdfTeX error (ext4): link annotations can't be nested.
>
> A random web search suggests that a newer TeX might be a good try.
OK, thanks. I didn't know there were newer TeX versions
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:51 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, thanks. I didn't know there were newer TeX versions. Is their a
> PDF build of our development docs available somewhere?
I'm building PDF docs regularly for each alpha release.
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/alpha
Hope thi
Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:51 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > OK, thanks. I didn't know there were newer TeX versions. Is their a
> > PDF build of our development docs available somewhere?
>
> I'm building PDF docs regularly for each al
16 matches
Mail list logo
